求救--大全8--〉No.9

mmfoolish

请教各位NN为何不选A? 答案E 为什么比A好呢？谢谢！！！！

A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer’s well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the lawsuit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singers’ services cost more than those of their imitators.

The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) Most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer’s rendition of a song from a good imitator’s rendition of the same song.

(B) Commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singers.

(C) The original versions of some well-known songs are unavailable for use in commercials.

(D) Advertising firms will continue to use imitators to mimic the physical mannerisms of famous singers.

(E) The advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercials.

likui

将A改写，Whether most people are able to distinguish a famous singer's rendition of a song from a good imitator's rendition of the same song.

这说是题目的premise (the famous singer won the lawsuit)所depend on的还差不多；

况且这里应该是most people are able to---才有可能won the lawsuit，A本身表述就是和逻辑推理反了。

E是conclusion (advertising costs will rise)所depend on的，因为广告公司如果不will use，也就没有了costs的will rise

不知道解析的清楚不