以下是引用margery_god在2008-5-5 0:09:00的发言:突然想起来了,XDF的FF讲过这道题 他的解释:因为D中有通勤者会转到其他的路上去,那就相当于给现在这条路上的drivers腾地方了,就是对它们benifit的. because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit. 就怀疑前提了(怀疑前提就是怀疑了结论的可靠性---LAWER) 这样想完全错误!注意这道题的问题是“哪个选项weaken这个计划在财务上的有效性”,而不是问“哪个选项weaken这个计划不公平的结论(weaken反对这个计划的意见)”。注意和后面一题的问题比较。 首先token是代币的意思,就是说你先买个token,下次过桥的时候用上次买的token就可以过桥了。 其次,注意问题问的是财务上的有效性,所以收支相减,赢利越多就越有效。 (A) Before the authority increases tolls on any of the area bridges, it is required by law to hold public hearings at which objections to the proposed increase can be raised. //在听证会这个计划被反对,也许这个计划不能实施,并不weaken这个计划在财务上的有效性
(B) Whenever bridge tolls are increased, the authority must pay a private contractor to adjust the automated toll-collecting machines. //这个属于一次性投资,对预期收益没有什么大的影响。
(C) Between the time a proposed toll increase is announced and the time the increase is actually put into effect, many commuters buy more tokens than usual to postpone the effects of the increase. //token的购买属于短期行为,对于题目中五年的计划没有影响。这个选项,好像很多人有疑问。有提出可以购买五年的代币。首先,这个想法太极端,不怎么符合常识。其次选项中也提及postpone the effects of the increase,所以只个短期行为!
(D) When tolls were last increased on the two bridges in question, almost 20 percent of the regular commuter traffic switched to a slightly longer alternative route that has since been improved. //少了20%的人,少了五分之一的收入,当然很大的影响了收入。另外注意选项中是过去时,是说上次增加了过桥费,就少了20%的人,那么这次很可能产生同样的效果,甚至少更多人。
(E) The chairman of the authority is a member of the Tristate Automobile Club, which has registered strong opposition to the proposed toll increase. //反对意见无法weaken计划的财务有效性。 以上分析来自对OG11的理解。
|