ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 804|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

feifei-38

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-8-11 15:44:00 | 只看该作者

feifei-38

Amphibian populations are declining in numbers worldwide. Not coincidentally, the earth’s ozone layer has been continuously depleted throughout the last 50 years. Atmospheric ozone blocks UV-B, a type of ultraviolet radiation that is continuously produced by the sun, and which can damage genes. Because amphibians lack hair, hide, or feathers to shield them, they are particularly vulnerable to UV-B radiation. In addition, their gelatinous eggs lack the protection of leathery or hard shells. Thus, the primary cause of the declining amphibian population is the depletion of the ozone layer.



Each of the following, if true, would strengthen the argument EXCEPT:



(A) Of the various types of radiation blocked by atmospheric ozone, UV-B is the only type that can damage genes.



(B) Amphibian populations are declining far more rapidly than are the populations of nonamphibian species whose tissues and eggs have more natural protection from UV-B.



(C) Atmospheric ozone has been significantly depleted above all the areas of the world in which amphibian populations are declining.



(D) The natural habitat of amphibians has not become smaller over the past century.



(E) Amphibian populations have declined continuously for the last 50 years.


答案是D,但本人认为应该是A。对A取非,即如果臭氧层里还有其他物质对genes有破坏作用,那么臭氧层的减少对amphibian的破坏作用更大,从而并没有削弱原题中的结论,因此A并没有增强结论作用。


D中说明amphibian的自然生存领地并没有减少,是排除了可能导致amphibian减少的其他原因。因此对原题中的结论有增强的作用。


大家说怎么理解呢?

沙发
发表于 2005-8-12 13:45:00 | 只看该作者
Yes, you are right.  A is the right answer.
板凳
发表于 2005-8-13 17:03:00 | 只看该作者
同感!握手
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 03:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部