A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?
78. A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people’s intentions as relevant to punishment. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above? (A) In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally. (B) In these stories, the severity of the harm produced was clearly stated. (C) Younger children are as likely to produce harm unintentionally as are older children. (D) The older children assigned punishment in a way that closely resembled the way adults had assigned punishment in a similar experiment. (E) The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories. 用排除法后只剩下A,但A中的答案却似乎也解释不通。文中的结论是:younger children不认为intension和punishment相关,但A并没有削弱这一点,反而有加强的意思?
OG解释的意思是:A表明了小孩子YOUNGER CHILDREN可能不能说出有意无意,因为他们没有成熟的思维。如此,即便小孩子在内心里是按照INTETION来分配惩罚,但是他们说不出,they might be unable to apply this criterion here.他们不会用INTETIONAL或者ACCIDENTAL这种标准来说怎么分配惩罚。而题目说,小孩子根本没有考虑用这个标准CRITERION来分配。从而削弱了题目。