ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (YRYX)

00:00:00

In addition to having more protein -than wheat does, the protein in rice is higher quality than that in wheat, with more of the amino acids essential to the human diet.

正确答案: B

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 7088|回复: 19
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 19

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-3-24 11:06:00 | 只看该作者

OG 19

OG19.   In addition to having more protein than wheat does, the protein in rice is higher quality than that in wheat, with more of the amino acids essential to the human diet.


(A) the protein in rice is higher quality than that in


(B) rice has protein of higher quality than that in


(C) the protein in rice is higher in quality than it is in


(D) rice protein is higher in quality than it is inB


(E) rice has a protein higher in quality than




每次看OG都会发现许多新的问题. 自以为这题熟悉的连答案都背下来了. 可是又发现新的困惑.



首先我知道正确答案为何正确以及其他答案为何错, 我不理解的是OG对于CD的一句解释:


In this sentence, the initial clause modifies the nearest noun, identifying it as the thing being compared with wheat. By making protein the noun modified, choices A, C, and D illogically compare wheat with protein and claim that the protein in rice has more protein than wheat does. In C and D, the comparative structure higher in quality than it is in wheat absurdly suggests that rice protein contains wheat. B, the best choice, logically compares wheat to rice by placing the noun rice immediately after the initial clause. B also uses that to refer to protein in making the comparison between the proteins of rice and wheat. Choice E needs either that in or does after wheat to make a complete and logical comparison.



可是我读了又读CD, 还是觉得是wheat contains protein, 而不是protein contains wheat.


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-3-24 11:08:02编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2005-3-24 11:40:00 | 只看该作者

个人认为in addition to其实也是一个并列结构,

所以  后面一句句子的主语要能用的上having这个动词

因此  只可以是rice

B/D选B 还是蛮容易判断的吧

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-24 11:46:00 | 只看该作者

我都知道.

麻烦大侠看一下我的提问好吗? 谢了!

地板
发表于 2005-3-24 11:59:00 | 只看该作者

看D:rice protein is higher in quality than it is in wheat


正确的比较应该是  rice protein is higher in quality than wheat protain。


那么认为it 应该指代wheat protain,然而错就错在这里,it只能指代出现过的名词,即rice protein。所以就变成了rice protein is in wheat了。


至于,谁包含谁的问题,好像没什么讲究吧!


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-3-24 12:16:26编辑过]
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-24 12:08:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用hawkinsxie在2005-3-24 11:59:00的发言:

MM真仔细啊!


看D:rice protein is higher in quality than it is in wheat


正确的比较应该是  rice protein is higher in quality than wheat protain。


那么认为it 应该指代wheat protain,然而错就错在这里,it只能指代出现过的名词,即rice protein。所以就变成了rice protein is in wheat了。




Bingo!!!

所以你也赞同rice protein is in wheat! 那也就是说wheat contains rice protein, 而不是OG所说的rice protein contains wheat!

contain应该是包含的意思吧. 是我复习着了魔头昏了.....还是ETS错了?

6#
发表于 2005-3-24 15:47:00 | 只看该作者

谈谈我的看法:


C/D项的意思:rice protein 在质量方面(in quality)比其在wheat方面( in wheat)更高。



所以ETS说C/D项荒谬的认为rice protein 包含了wheat。


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-3-24 15:49:46编辑过]
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-25 08:42:00 | 只看该作者

  the protein in rice is higher in quality than it is in wheat

这句话翻译成中文就是: rice里的protein也在wheat里, (即 wheat contains rice protein). 并且质量要更好.

我认为 it 在这里指代的是 the protein in rice, 所以 ETS 对这句话的解释反了. ETS : rice protein contains wheat.  当然, 这并不影响解这道题. 本着精益求精的态度, 我还是想弄明白是我错了还是ETS错了.

8#
发表于 2005-3-29 14:01:00 | 只看该作者

我认为 it 在这里指代的是 the protein in rice, 所以 ETS 对这句话的解释反了. ETS : rice protein contains wheat.  当然, 这并不影响解这道题. 本着精益求精的态度, 我还是想弄明白是我错了还是ETS错了.

我觉得MM有点只源身在此山中的意思(嘿嘿,俺也经常这样),但如果把此题放段时日再看,能否接受这样的解法:

the protein in rice 在质量方面比the protein in rice在WHEAT方面更高一些。

我认为 it 在这里指代的是 the protein in rice,

俺也认同你关于IT的指代

9#
发表于 2005-3-29 14:05:00 | 只看该作者
如果MM能接受上面的中文解释,那对ETS关于这句话所蕴涵的逻辑错误就比较容易理解了:



the protein in rice 在质量方面比the protein in rice在WHEAT方面更高一些。



the protein in rice有质量及WHEAT这些特质,则说明the protein in rice 蕴涵质量和WHEAT这两样东东。


BTW,虽然本人发现了点ETS在CR上的错误,还真没发现ETS在RC上有错误,嘿嘿,毕竟是人家制定规则嘛。


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-3-29 14:08:41编辑过]
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-31 03:47:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用fr6102790在2005-3-29 14:05:00的发言:
如果MM能接受上面的中文解释,那对ETS关于这句话所蕴涵的逻辑错误就比较容易理解了:>


the protein in rice有质量及WHEAT这些特质,则说明the protein in rice 蕴涵质量和WHEAT这两样东东。


BTW,虽然本人发现了点ETS在CR上的错误,还真没发现ETS在RC上有错误,嘿嘿,毕竟是人家制定规则嘛。




多谢楼上一语点醒梦中人.

但ETS是否在SC中有破绽, 请看以下两个贴子.

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&star=2&replyid=588636&id=5332&skin=0&page=2

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=101816

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 15:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部