- UID
- 1368010
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2018-10-15
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
1. 2.59 0:45
B: new rings disappear in 3 days
P: Switch over all old to new rings
C: no wild animals will be harmed threaten by suffocation
H: the 3days appearance won’t cause suffocation. The old will not be available to animals.
Suffocation: 窒息
A: E B—what about the old rings?
E said nothing about the treated of suffocation, so irrelevant!
Lesson: Read closely and know precisely what the author said. Do not generalize! Remember, one of the rules for weakening arguments is to focus on the conclusion, and knowing the details of the conclusion is part of that focus.
2. 2:00 0:32
P: kill tiger shark to cause tourist back
C: help the second industry income
H: this won’ have negative economic effect on other area, such as the first industry.
A: D
3. 2:12 1:18
P: though E people love E apple, sell the K apple in half price
C: it can earn profit
H: some reason E people will buy K apple low price will attract E people to buy
A: E
4. 2:25 1:02
P: move 车站入口 from expansive area to cheap
C: save money & no negative impact
H: the movement won’t affect passagers— won’t affect the income.
A: B
5. 1:38 0:32
P: PZ 每车事故最少受伤
C:PZ最安全
H:受伤最少=最安全,没有其他安全隐患
A: C
|
|