ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6529|回复: 22
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd18-10

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-11-18 17:25:00 | 只看该作者

gwd18-10

Q7 to Q10:


      The term “episodic memory” was


       introduced by Tulving to refer to what he


       considered a uniquely human capacity—


Line       the ability to recollect specific past events,


  (5)       to travel back into the past in one’s own


mind—as distinct from the capacity simply


to use information acquired through past


experiences.  Subsequently, Clayton et al.


developed criteria to test for episodic


(10)      memory in animals.  According to these


criteria, episodic memories are not of


individual bits of information; they involve


multiple components of a single event


“bound” together.  Clayton sought to


(15)      examine evidence of scrub jays’ accurate


memory of “what,” “where,” and “when”


information and their binding of this infor-


mation.  In the wild, these birds store food


for retrieval later during periods of food


(20)      scarcity.  Clayton’s experiment required


       jays to remember the type, location, and


       freshness of stored food based on a unique


learning event.  Crickets were stored in one


location and peanuts in another.  Jays


(25)      prefer crickets, but crickets degrade


more quickly.  Clayton’s birds switched


their preference from crickets to peanuts


once the food had been stored for a certain


length of time, showing that they retain


(30)      information about the what, the where,


and the when.  Such experiments cannot,


however, reveal whether the birds were


       reexperiencing the past when retrieving the


information.  Clayton acknowledged this by


using the term “episodic-like” memory.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Q10:


In order for Clayton’s experiment to show that scrub jays have episodic-like memory, which of the following must be true in the experiment?




  • Some of the jays retrieved stored peanuts on the first occasion they were allowed to retrieve food.

  • All the crickets were retrieved before any of the peanuts were.

  • The peanuts were stored further away than the crickets.

  • When a jay attempted to retrieve a cricket or a peanut, the jay was prevented from eating it.

  • Throughout the experiment the jays were fed at levels typical of a time of scarcity.
  • 请教第10题,答案E。实验和缺乏时间有什么关系呢?
    沙发
    发表于 2005-11-18 21:28:00 | 只看该作者

    (15)      examine evidence of scrub jays’ accurate


    memory of “what,” “where,” and “when”


    information and their binding of this infor-


    mation.  In the wild, these birds store food


    for retrieval later during periods of food


    (20)      scarcity.  


    定位是在19-20 line。开始的时候我也做错了。说明ETS很狡猾,细节题考的很刁。。。

    板凳
    发表于 2005-11-23 16:24:00 | 只看该作者

    这个题目什么意思


    这种测试一定要在食物短缺的情况下做才可以吗


    地板
    发表于 2006-9-20 18:18:00 | 只看该作者

    不太理解2楼的引用,2楼的引用说在野外鸟儿需要为了应付食物短缺的季节而收藏食物。E说鸟的确是按照食物缺乏的时间来喂。文章说的是,经过了一个独特的学习模式让鸟记住了食物的地点等等,所以鸟才能去寻找,这个和自然是没关系的,纯粹为了证明鸟能记住之前食物的存放地。而文章的最后说,试验结果不能确定是否鸟经历了之前的找回经验。如果E是正确的话,那么就能证明,鸟的确经历了之前的找回过程,和时间、自然、食物等信息联系到一起,这样的话就不是episodic-like,而是episodic memory了。

    所以我选A

    5#
    发表于 2007-4-10 21:50:00 | 只看该作者

    这题A是正确的。

    A说鸟在回去找食物时首先找的就是peanut,这个符合原文说的鸟prefer
                cricket,但是能记住什么储存cricket的,如果储存时间过长的话,cricket就腐烂了,于是鸟就prefer peanut了。如果假设A不成立,就是说鸟都会先去看cricket,然后发现腐烂了再去找peanut,这就不能证明鸟能retain 
                            
    information about the what, the where,and the when了。这就与原文矛盾。所以A必对!

    E是无关选项。原文只是说鸟会储藏食物,以备食物匮乏时用。E是说“贯穿整个实验,鸟一直被喂食物缺乏时(他们所需的)饭量”。这个不是必然。

    6#
    发表于 2007-5-31 21:42:00 | 只看该作者

    同意樓上的觀點 我也選A

    有達人出來證實一下嗎?

    7#
    发表于 2007-6-2 16:15:00 | 只看该作者
    8#
    发表于 2007-6-12 20:32:00 | 只看该作者

    must be true in the experiment?”

    我的理解是要注意题目中的词MUST

    ABCD中都只能说明个例或者某些方面

    只有E不和题目冲突

    9#
    发表于 2007-6-14 13:47:00 | 只看该作者
    I believe the answer is A: Jays retrieve the same (satisfies what)
    stored (satisfies where) peanuts at the first opportunity (when).
    "Clayton’s birds switched

    their preference from crickets to peanuts

    once the food had been stored for a certain

    length of time, showing that they retain

     (30)  information about the what, the where,

    and the when. "



    Why
    Not B: Retrieving "rotting" crickets would not satisfy the "what"
    requirement. Rotting crickets do not equal the "fresh" crickets that
    the Jays presumably remember
    Why Not E: The question is asking what
    can cause Episode-Like memory. Being fed during food scarcity has
    nothing to do with qualifying for the 3 requirements of Episode-Like
    memory.
    10#
    发表于 2007-7-7 23:47:00 | 只看该作者
    我也选A
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-29 14:54
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部