香港760(Q50,V41)放狗

zz68

作文
a real estate agent mentioned the below:

"Over the last five years, the housing prices in our city have doubled. During the same time, the stock market has fallen. So now it is a good time for the city residents to buy houses as an investment. In additional, home owners can also live in the houses they bought and that can improve one's quality of life, whereas there is no such similar benefit if one buys stocks."


数学
1. 一个大圆里面有一个小圆，小圆的半径是大圆的1/2. 求阴影面积和占大圆面积的比例。答案3/4

3.某个牛奶的shelf life average是9.6天，比(9.6+x) shelf life还长的可能性和比(9.6-x) shelf life还短的可能性是一样的， shelf life从（9.6-2.1）天到（9.6+2.1）天的总共可能性是68%, 问shelf life超过11.7天的可能性是多少？这个题考的是normal distribution, 答案是（1-68%）/2=16%
4. 一个学校一年要发总额为940000的奖学金，有三种不同额度的奖学金，一人95000，35000，10000，问奖学金获得者最少多少人？答案15 （940000=9*95000+1*35000+5*10000）


阅读
1. car dealer
-because cars nowadays are not distinguishable in terms of quality and functions, car dealers need to distinguish themselves via sales and services.
-sales and services are defined whether they are "best in kind." Customers define "best in kind" services as being able to have their cars fixed in one-go. 35% of the time car dealers cannot fix customers' cars in one go
-traditional mindset to solve this problem is to improve training for technicians at car delears.
-but there are three reason why such training approach actually cannot improve services for clients.

2. medevial women
这篇挺长的，有1.5屏，很多细节题，估计是难题库。
p1
-medevial time was considered a "golden time" for women in a lot of historians' minds. These historians believe that women's economic rights did not deteriate until 16th and 17th century when industrial revolution happened.
-mentiond two historians' studies to support the above conclusion. The studies were all about women in the 16th and 17th century.

p2
- but we cannot use evidence about women in the 16th and 17th century to argue points about women in the 15th century
-such economic deteriation for women in fact happened before 16th century. Quote some evidence to support this conclusion

P3
-There are some historians who are still very adament about believing women during Medeival time was doing fine.
-for example, quote two historians' studies and argue how they were flawed and over-simplified.


3. innovation in big vs. small companies
p1
-common belief is that big companies are more effective in their research and development (R&D) work and can get more out of R&D investment.
-but that is actually not the case. Small companies can actually get more out of their R&D investment than big companies can.

p2
-why can small companies get more out of their R&D investment than big companies can?
-once a new technology/ knoweldge is developed, it is very different to ring-fence. So over time other people will know this knowledge.
-small companies get as much knowledge from this "R&D" spillover as big companies do. Yet small companies pay less for R&D than big companies.
-so small companies get more bang for their buck

逻辑
1. somebody did a research on the relationship between people being kind to their spouses and their happiniess level. the researcher concluded that people being kind to their spouses will lead to higher happiness level. How to strengthen the argument?
答案是researcher found out that just because people are happier,  it doesn't mean they will be nicer their spouses.

jiangjiang2016

呀，膜拜牛牛

Crystal_Chai

沾沾喜气！~~~~~~~~

alzn2765

这个作文不太好写；
1. gratuitous assumption: investors who could invest in stock are equally qualified to invest in property. It is possible that the investors who could invest in stock do not possess the required capital to invest in property as the capital requirement for the latter is apparently higher than that of the former. (北京炒房首付要多少？炒股1000元就可以开户。不是哥不想炒房，无力装逼。)
2. gratuitous assumption: investors who invest in property will improve his quality of life. 哥投资的房子买在保定，哥在天安门上班，每天2点起来上班。。。。哥投资买的房子是shoebox unit，只有45平米，哥有7个娃外带老婆和双方父母，都住进去。。。。
3. Cost-benefit analysis: The high property price may not lead to high return. 卖房政府收200％的税咋整？每个月收100万物业费咋整？隔壁是黑社会每天砸门来敲门收保护费咋整？股票可以立即套现，房子不可以。

温润的风

超赞楼主好厉害 但是并没有看懂逻辑题的答案(´･_･`)

hedingdingyiqi

膜拜一下~lz太棒了！

小酥饭

hedingdingyiqi 发表于 2016-3-22 20:38
膜拜一下~lz太棒了！

Mark一下！               

alzn2765

hedingdingyiqi 发表于 2016-3-22 20:38
膜拜一下~lz太棒了！

感谢温润的风提醒，我的确错了。

1. somebody did a research on the relationship between people being kind to their spouses and their happiniess level. the researcher concluded that people being kind to their spouses will lead to higher happiness level. How to strengthen the argument?
答案是researcher found out that just because people are happier,  it doesn't mean they will be nicer their spouses.

因（前提）： people being kind to their spouses
果（结论）： higher happiness level

加强要么是defender类加强：
非因果倒置，非无因果关系，非他因

要么是非因非果的加强：
非因：NOT kind to their spouses
非果：NOT higher happiness level

不管是哪一个答案，都必须有“非”，所以选项中无否定意思的必错。

狗主答案是：
非因果倒置： 不是因为higher happiness level才kind to their spouses的。狗主答案正确。

alzn2765

温润的风 发表于 2016-3-22 19:55
超赞楼主好厉害 但是并没有看懂逻辑题的答案(´･_･`)

1. somebody did a research on the relationship between people being kind to their spouses and their happiniess level. the researcher concluded that people being kind to their spouses will lead to higher happiness level. How to strengthen the argument?
答案是researcher found out that just because people are happier,  it doesn't mean they will be nicer their spouses.

因（前提）： people being kind to their spouses
果（结论）： higher happiness level

加强要么是defender类加强：
非因果倒置，非无因果关系，非他因

要么是非因非果的加强：
非因：NOT kind to their spouses
非果：NOT higher happiness level

不管是哪一个答案，都必须有“非”，所以选项中无否定意思的必错。

狗主答案是：
非因果倒置： 不是因为higher happiness level才kind to their spouses的。狗主答案正确。