［提问］有一个逻辑题，我不是很明白，望高人指点！！

mong

Pediatrician: Child psychologists recommend that mothers of one-year olds not only name objects in the immediate environment, but that they include the color of the object, when applicable. For instance, if a mother hands her child a red ball, she should say, “This is a red ball.” Nonetheless, even if mothers began to name the color, instead of simply saying, “This is a ball,” no real benefit will be conferred to the child, because studies have shown that children under 18-months old do not grasp the notion of color.

The pediatrician’s argument is most vulnerable to which of the following?

A) Infants who hear words embedded in sentences that have each part of speech present tend to speak sooner than those infants who do not.
B) Children usually benefit from having toys in their environments.
C) The range at which children utter their first sentence typically ranges from 15-months to 30-months.
D) Children under the age of three tend to be confused when parents use adult level vocabulary.
E) Psychologists have conducted studies showing that most children under the age of 30 months often utter the names of colors even when that color is not present in their environments.

［我的分析］首先，这是一个weaken原题目的问题。A）是对原题目的支持（错）； B)、C)、D）是无关信息（错），所以选E

［正确答案］A （请问能不能告诉我为什么A是对的？我真的觉得很奇怪！是不是我哪里理解错了啊？真的谢谢了！！）

mong

晓野的野 发表于 2013-10-5 01:09
先读懂题目
儿童心理学家说，一岁大的小孩的妈妈会以包含颜色的名字来对出现在身边的东西命名
比如，如果一 ...

哦哦   哈哈～～ 我太恍惚了，谢谢～～

晓野的野

先读懂题目
儿童心理学家说，一岁大的小孩的妈妈会以包含颜色的名字来对出现在身边的东西命名
比如，如果一个妈妈给小孩红色的球，她就会说，这是红色的球哟
但是，即使妈妈用包含颜色的名字来命名而非简单的说这是一个球，小孩也不会获得任何利益
因为18个月大的小孩还不懂什么是颜色

结论 小孩不能从含有颜色的命名来获益

A 婴儿听的话中如果有words包含在句子中，比那些没有这些东西的婴儿，更早开始说话（言外之意就是说婴儿获益了的，哪怕他们不懂也能获益）
A驳斥了原文的结论

E 大多在30个月下的婴儿能够表达颜色，即使没有出现在周围环境中。
即使这样，也不能证明婴儿从中获利的啊
而且30月下于18个月下，比较范围都不同了，不对