ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6737|回复: 19
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【OG12-(7&8)】GMAT-RC专项资料精炼提升(4)

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-2-27 00:54:40 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
汇总链接(要求详细说明):
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_RC/thread-668154-1-1.html
【OG12-(5&6)】GMAT-RC专项资料精炼提升(3)链接:
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_RC/thread-670169-1-1.html
【OG12-(9&10)】GMAT-RC专项资料精炼提升(5)链接:
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_RC/thread-671830-1-1.html

OG12-7


 In 1988 services moved ahead of
manufacturing as the main product of the United
States economy. But what is meant by "services"?
Some economists define a service as something
(5)that is produced and consumed simultaneously, for
example, a haircut. The broader, classical definition
is that a service is an intangible something that
cannot be touched or stored. Yet electric utilities
can store energy, and computer programmers
(10) save information electronically. Thus, the classical
definition is hard to sustain.
           The United States government's definition is
more practical: services are the residual category
that includes everything that is not agriculture or
(15) industry. Under this definition, services includes
activities as diverse as engineering and driving a
bus. However, besides lacking a strong conceptual
framework, this definition fails to recognize the
distinction between service industries and service
(20) occupations. It categorizes workers based on their
company's final product rather than on the actual
work the employees perform. Thus, the many
service workers employed by manufacturers—
bookkeepers or janitors, for example—would
(25) fall under the industrial rather than the services
category. Such ambiguities reveal the arbitrariness
of this definition and suggest that, although
practical for government purposes, it does not
accurately reflect the composition of the current
(30) United States economy.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
20#
发表于 2012-10-28 17:51:43 | 只看该作者
44题不理解
19#
发表于 2012-10-14 21:50:44 | 只看该作者
8到底是什么文章类型呀
18#
发表于 2012-6-15 18:19:13 | 只看该作者
THANKS~~~
17#
发表于 2012-3-4 11:17:53 | 只看该作者
16#
发表于 2012-3-4 11:17:42 | 只看该作者
15#
发表于 2012-3-4 11:17:31 | 只看该作者
Q31 Main idea (主旨题)
作者想要的探索一个concept --- service
其余几个要不就是没有提到,要不就是已经
Q32 Inference
作者对于classical definition的态度是什么
原文中给出了this definition is hard to sustain
Thus we choose moredifficult to apply
Q33 inference
Under thedefinition of services in US government, many services occupancies are belongedto industries.
因此人数可能会减少,政府census的时候判断出现错误。
其他的选项都没有提及
Q34 supportingideas
政府定义的缺点-定义缺点(无法区分工作种类)
It categorizesworkers based on their company’s final product rather than on the actual workthe employees perform
D是一个混淆选项,但是选项中的diversity并没有被提及
Q35 Logical structure
问的是文中的一个例子起到什么作用
起到的目的是support the concern in the government’s definition of service
A中指出unclassified,但其实是misclassified(misleading)
14#
发表于 2012-3-4 11:17:20 | 只看该作者
OG12-7
从这篇开始开始计时处理,为的是让每一篇文章可以在3min内完成月度,并且理解并记住80%
回忆:time1:48:2
这篇讲的是服务的定义
1:服务业从1988年开始就成为美国的主要产业,因此要对服务业进行定义
2:最开始的定义就是服务就是购买和生产是同时进行的
3:再推到广域来讲,服务就是那些看不见摸不着的东西。但是很多东西,比如电啊什么的也是如此,所以说是错误的
4:政府的定义可能更加有效,他是说服务是工农产品之外的商品的剩余价值。因此很多服务产业得以定义
5:但是这个样子的话是从最终产品而非工作性质来定义。从而导致了无法区分服务行业和服务职业的关系
6:有些时候可能有些职业是服务性的,但是行业是工业,因此被归到了工业当中。虽然这样子便于政府处理,但是仍然使得定义模糊。
结构:
本文是对于一个定义的探索(service
给出service的概念
1:定义一拓展到classical definition
2:进一步给出政府的定义---仍然有优点 (可以清晰定义)和缺点(仍然不能分辨出service industry service occupancies)
3:最后仍然没有可出结论,说是这个无法反应美国的经济现况
两段论,均给出理论,每段给出一个解释,但是都有各自的缺点
可以有的题目是:
主旨题
为什么政府的定义不能反映美国经济现状
例子一和例子二的关系
第二段有什么用
13#
发表于 2012-2-28 01:39:39 | 只看该作者
帮饭饭顶贴~~~~
12#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-27 22:10:19 | 只看该作者
顶顶~~!!!-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/2/27 21:13:04)

~~~~~suri亲好可耐的说~~~~O(∩_∩)O哈哈~~~~谢谢哇~~~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-10 17:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部