ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1677|回复: 18
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助一道有争议GWD语法,有兴趣的来看看把

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-12-6 22:37:01 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
Whereas lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, in the Internet industry they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete one day may be partners the next.

A.     Whereas lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, in the Internet industry they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete    
B.    Although the lines of competition are clearly defined in industries that are more established, they are blurred and indistinct in the Internet industry, as competing companies
C.    The lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, unlike the Internet where they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete
D.    Unlike more established industries, where the lines of competition are clearly defined, they are burred and indistinct in the Internet industry, as companies that compete
E.    Unlike more established industries, with clearly defined lines of competition, those of the Internet industry are blurred and indistinct, as competing companies

争议说A OR B。
可是我一开始选了C。。。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
19#
发表于 2011-12-7 07:26:25 | 只看该作者
我選A 以下是我的意見
1.they 在AB兩句都沒有廣泛指代的問題,因為語法規則說代名詞優先代替原題主詞,這兩句的主詞均為lines 所以they沒有問題
第一句還原應該是
Whereas lines of competition are clearly defined as companies that compete one day may be partners the next in the more established industries, they are blurred and indistinct in the internet industry. 但是語法規則說 不可以頭重腳輕~這面這句頭很重 腳很輕
2. 第二句錯誤主要是改變了原題的句意
as competing companies跟 as companies that compete 句子意思完全不同 美國人會跟你老生常談這akward....
所以一切都是 懂得句意為先
18#
发表于 2011-12-6 23:47:21 | 只看该作者
偶的意思是:A和B都有这个they指代不清的问题,不能以此来排除A而保留B吧。

唉,这种题最纠结了,考试时碰到都不知道该哭还是笑,呵呵。
17#
发表于 2011-12-6 23:43:27 | 只看该作者
a我觉得错得很明显啊...首先they指代不明,不知道是指lines还是industries;其次从句意上说,they如果一定要指只能指lines,那lines是不能说成as companies的,doesn't make sense
-- by 会员 redsox1989 (2011/12/6 23:14:44)




A和B在they这一点上貌似一样吧?
-- by 会员 Talen16 (2011/12/6 23:31:25)



既然不能确定,就是confusing了。一个代词也不能同时指两个东西吧。
16#
发表于 2011-12-6 23:31:25 | 只看该作者
a我觉得错得很明显啊...首先they指代不明,不知道是指lines还是industries;其次从句意上说,they如果一定要指只能指lines,那lines是不能说成as companies的,doesn't make sense
-- by 会员 redsox1989 (2011/12/6 23:14:44)



A和B在they这一点上貌似一样吧?
15#
发表于 2011-12-6 23:29:38 | 只看该作者
我选A。原因1. industries that are more established没有the more established industries简洁。2,其实A和B的主要不同在后半句:A是companies that compete one day may be partners the next.B是competing companies one day may be partners the next.这个B有没有one day都别扭。3,原文优先:)

不过GWD的答案还是比较可信的,愚见仅供参考

14#
发表于 2011-12-6 23:24:32 | 只看该作者
我觉得AS在这的解释是“因为”引导完整的句子,不是“作为”
13#
发表于 2011-12-6 23:14:44 | 只看该作者
a我觉得错得很明显啊...首先they指代不明,不知道是指lines还是industries;其次从句意上说,they如果一定要指只能指lines,那lines是不能说成as companies的,doesn't make sense
12#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-12-6 23:01:30 | 只看该作者
不过N +THAT+BE动词+形容词的结构不是累赘么,B 里面用的就是。
11#
发表于 2011-12-6 23:00:49 | 只看该作者
这道题应该是选A,one day 和 the next 都作为compete的状语,在B里面,one day做company的定语,the next 就显多余了。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-5 18:48
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部