ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2809|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

老prep 第二部分23 boldface

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-11-6 12:40:20 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
23.   (28303-!-item-!-188;#058&003943)


A product that represents a clear technologicaladvance over competing products can generally command a high price. Becausetechnological advances tend to be quickly surpassed and companies want to makelarge profits while they still can, many companies charge the maximum possibleprice for such a product.  But largeprofits on the new product will give competitors a strong incentive to quicklymatch the new product's capabilities.  Consequently,the strategy to maximize overall profit from a new product is to charge lessthan the greatest possible price.


In the argument above, the two portions in boldfaceplay which of the following roles?


(A) The first is a consideration that has beenraised to argue that a certain strategy is counterproductive; the secondpresents that strategy.

(B) The first is a consideration raised to supportthe strategy that the argument recommends; the second presents that strategy.

(C) The first is a consideration raised to explainthe appeal of a certain strategy; the second presents that strategy.

(D) The first is an assumption, rejected by theargument, that has been used to justify a course of action; the second presentsthat course of action.

(E) The first is a consideration that has beenused to justify pursuing a goal that the argument rejects; the second presentsa course of action that has been adopted in pursuit of that goal.

答案选C,很不理解,第二部分明明是but转折了啊,怎么第一部分还会appeal this strategy呢?



thx~

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
8#
发表于 2012-5-10 20:35:47 | 只看该作者
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-715217-1-1.html
7#
发表于 2012-5-10 20:31:26 | 只看该作者
我的理解是这样的:
the strategy to maximize overall profit from a new product is to charge lessthan the greatest possible price.
最佳策略是收取比最高价格低一些的价。第一部分黑体解释了为什么是偏向最高价格,两个黑体中间的but解释了为什么要稍低一点
所以策略前面的两部分看似矛盾,其实是被“比最高价格稍低一点”相统一了。
6#
发表于 2012-5-10 20:22:57 | 只看该作者
应该是说后面consequently是对前面strategy的解释,不是两个strategy,而是一个。就是要收最大可能的价格。而那个最大可能的价格=小于最贵价格。故而the second presents that strategy
5#
发表于 2011-12-30 00:01:26 | 只看该作者
说说我的理解:
4句话:1 the strategy  2explain 3object the explain 4 conclusion,further explain the strategy
仔细看看4 并不与1矛盾
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-11-6 14:22:20 | 只看该作者
嗯 貌似只能这样理解
板凳
发表于 2011-11-6 14:15:44 | 只看该作者
The first is a consideration raised to explainthe appeal of a certain strategy; the second presents that strategy.

前半句中the appeal of a certain strategy, 那certain strategy是不是就是"many companies charge the maximum possibleprice for such a product”, 后半句的that strategy也就是指这个strategy, 但实际上the second boldface是给出了另一个更好的strategy, 不一致,怎么理解呢?
沙发
发表于 2011-11-6 12:54:13 | 只看该作者
a certain strategy是指to  charge the maximum possibleprice for such a product哦~
所以第一个BF解释了为什么那些商家会采用这样的策略
but的转折作用是强调上文的策略其实不好,然后转折引出更好的策略。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-2 20:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部