PREP第二题，求指点啊！！！

xuehanyang

Economist:On average,the emergency treatment for an elderly person for injuries resulting from a fall costs $11,000.A new therapeutic program can significantly reduce an elderly person's chances of falling.Though obviously desirable for many resons,this treatment program will cost $12,500 and thus cannot be justified.

Which of the following ,if true, most eriously undermines the conclusion of the argument?

A Among elderly people who had followed th program for only a few months,the number of serious falls was higher than it was for people who had followed the program for its recommended minimum length of one year.
B Falls resulting in serious injuries are less common among elderly people living in nursing homes than they are among elderly people who live alone at home.
C A frequent result of injuries sustained in falls is long-term pain,medication for which is not counted among the average per-person costs of emergency treatment for elderly people's injuries form such falls.
D The new therapeutic program focuses on therapies other than medication, since overmedication can cause disorientation and hence increase the likelihood that an elderly person will have a serious fall
E a significant portion of the cost of the new therapeutic program is represented by regular visits by health care professionals,the costs of which tend to increase more rapidly than do those of other elements of the programs.


答案是C，谁能解释一下D啊~~~~~为什么是C？？？

小伊YSY

D易误选，虽然new program不重视medication，但是有medication并不是一定会有overmedication，后面新概念的引入有一定的误导性。

victorss

很好理解嘛~C说摔倒后的痛苦是长期的，在长期这段时间内也会有一些治疗费用，而这些治疗费用没有包含在11K里面。所以可能11K+长期治疗费用>12K。因此12K的项目就省钱了。