求助一道逻辑

bobo1990

完全不明白什么意思
Abolish taxes, and real taxpayers would find that their disposable incomes have increased. Abolish taxes, and public employees would find that their incomes have disappeared.
Which one of the following is a logical conclusion that depends on information in both of the statements above?
(A) Public offices should be abolished so that disposable incomes will rise.
(B) The only real taxpayers are those who would have more to spend if they did not pay taxes.
(C) Public employees are not real taxpayers.
(D) Public employees’ incomes should not be taxed since they come from taxes.（C）
(E) If there were no taxes, then public employees could not be paid.

colorsmile

题目中两句话有一个共同的abolish taxes。也就可以看根据这个，在real taxayers & public employees中间架设一个桥梁，把他们联系起来，得出一个conclusion。就像是a>>b. a>>c. 那么b&c就是根据a 这个共同元素的出来的
A说should abolish ，题目中没有表达说因为会增加可支配收入就要abolish public officers。
B 中注意only，太绝对的一半都错误
D题目是conclusion,这个跟public 要不要taxed 没有关系。
E就只是重复表达了题目的第二句话。没有conclusion2句话

个人理解呀。。我是菜鸟，我是菜鸟= =
求NN 解释。。。。。