ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop animal-induced allergies, some of them quite serious. In a survey of current employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal-induced allergies. Based on this sample, experts conclude that among members of the general population who have spent a similarly large amount of time in close contact with animals, the percentage with animal-induced allergies is not 30 percent but substantially more.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest grounds for the experts' conclusion?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4716

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2569|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助一题 多谢

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-7-27 16:07:27 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop animal-induced allergies, some of them quite serious. In a survey of current employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal-induced allergies. Based on this sample, experts conclude that among members of the general population who have spent a similarly large amount of time in close contact with animals, the percentage with animal-induced allergies is not 30 percent but substantially more.
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest grounds for the experts’ conclusion?
A
A.    A zoo employee who develops a serious animal-induced allergy is very likely to switch to some other occupation.
B.    A zoo employee is more likely than a person in the general population to keep one or more animal pets at home
C.    The percentage of the general population whose level of exposure to animals matches that of a zoo employee is quite small.
D.    Exposure to domestic pets is, on the whole, less likely to cause animal-induced allergy than exposure to many of the animals kept in zoos.
E.    Zoo employees seldom wear protective gear when they handle animals in their care.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-7-27 20:10:44 | 只看该作者
恩  多谢了 明白了
沙发
发表于 2010-7-27 18:08:24 | 只看该作者
给LZ说两种方法吧:
读题:
EVIDENCE: 动物园员工30%会染病
CONCLUSION: 总人口中超过30%会染病

简化模型:
EVIDENCE:   X——Z
CONCLUSION:    Y——Z
缺一个桥梁就是X----Y,你看看A选项是不是直接把X——Y搭上了桥  
X是动物园员工,Y是总人口


再来个直接的方法:
我们无非是想说,总人口要>30%
题目已知的是current动物园员工人口中是30%
A说的的是,生病的经常换工作,也就是说30%的被少算了,因为重病的就会换工作。

希望lz能明白吧
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-29 09:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部