GWD TN24一道题~~

水色青空

T-4-Q14 GWD-13-38
Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from Canada’s Kodlunarn Island examined for gold content.  Because high gold content was reported, Elizabeth I funded two mining expeditions.  Neither expedition found any gold there.  Modern analysis of the island’s soil indicates a very low gold content.  Thus the methods used to determine the gold content of Frobisher’s samples must have been inaccurate.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The gold content of the soil on Kodlunarn Island is much lower today than it was in the sixteenth century.
B. The two mining expeditions funded by Elizabeth I did not mine the same part of Kodlunarn Island.
C. The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples provided by Frobisher were different from those generally used in the sixteenth century.
D. Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for gold content.
E. Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined.








答案选E。。。。没太看明白题目的逻辑？？》。。

谢谢大家！~

xiaojingzi1015

我觉得D有道理啊  想想看  A和B 两样东西拿来比较  说含金量由于检测方法的不一样而有高有低  那前提就必须是两个东西来源于同一个地方才可以啊  怎么会无关呢

水色青空

video里说not直接干掉

-- by 会员 mobilecdpyn (2010/2/23 21:40:06)

噢~~~~我再找些题目试试看~~~

mycontrol01

哪些题目里有not则直接干掉啊?

mobilecdpyn

video里说not直接干掉

水色青空

GWD讲的

-- by 会员 mobilecdpyn (2010/2/23 15:27:46)

你上过他的课？
XDF只讲了百分之七十的题可以这样做....

mobilecdpyn

GWD讲的

水色青空

Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from Canada’s Kodlunarn Island examined for gold content.  Because high gold content was reported, Elizabeth I funded two mining expeditions.  Neither expedition found any gold there.  Modern analysis of the island’s soil indicates a very low gold content.  Thus the methods used to determine the gold content of Frobisher’s samples must have been inaccurate.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
原文说了两件事：检测金含量的高低，方法是否精确。
A. The gold content of the soil on Kodlunarn Island is much lower today than it was in the sixteenth century. 主干无否定词排除
B. The two mining expeditions funded by Elizabeth I did not mine the same part of Kodlunarn Island. 方法没检查同一个地方
C. The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples provided by Frobisher were different from those generally used in the sixteenth century.主干无否定词排除
D. Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for gold content. any other绝对化
E. Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined. 金没有被添加
剩BE
看B 方法没检查同一个地方和方法是否精确是两回事，你必须要往里加入“是否检查同一个地方”和“这方法时候精确”间的关系才能使B对原文起作用
E 金没有被添加 和原文金含量的高低有关 不用加入自己的想法就获得
选E

-- by 会员 mobilecdpyn (2010/2/22 22:24:08)

为什么没有否定词就直接排除？

mobilecdpyn

D的错误还在于 说的是F有无别的地的标本 和原文无关

mobilecdpyn

Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from Canada’s Kodlunarn Island examined for gold content.  Because high gold content was reported, Elizabeth I funded two mining expeditions.  Neither expedition found any gold there.  Modern analysis of the island’s soil indicates a very low gold content.  Thus the methods used to determine the gold content of Frobisher’s samples must have been inaccurate.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
原文说了两件事：检测金含量的高低，方法是否精确。
A. The gold content of the soil on Kodlunarn Island is much lower today than it was in the sixteenth century. 主干无否定词排除
B. The two mining expeditions funded by Elizabeth I did not mine the same part of Kodlunarn Island. 方法没检查同一个地方
C. The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples provided by Frobisher were different from those generally used in the sixteenth century.主干无否定词排除
D. Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for gold content. any other绝对化
E. Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined. 金没有被添加
剩BE
看B 方法没检查同一个地方和方法是否精确是两回事，你必须要往里加入“是否检查同一个地方”和“这方法时候精确”间的关系才能使B对原文起作用
E 金没有被添加 和原文金含量的高低有关 不用加入自己的想法就获得
选E