ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from Canada's Kodlunarn Island examined for gold content. Because high gold content was reported, Elizabeth I funded two mining expeditions. Neither expedition found any gold there. Modern analysis of the island's soil indicates a very low gold content. Thus the methods used to determine the gold content of Frobisher's samples must have been inaccurate.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 13049|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD TN24一道题~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-2-22 14:04:27 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
T-4-Q14 GWD-13-38
Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from Canada’s Kodlunarn Island examined for gold content.  Because high gold content was reported, Elizabeth I funded two mining expeditions.  Neither expedition found any gold there.  Modern analysis of the island’s soil indicates a very low gold content.  Thus the methods used to determine the gold content of Frobisher’s samples must have been inaccurate.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The gold content of the soil on Kodlunarn Island is much lower today than it was in the sixteenth century.
B. The two mining expeditions funded by Elizabeth I did not mine the same part of Kodlunarn Island.
C. The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples provided by Frobisher were different from those generally used in the sixteenth century.
D. Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for gold content.
E. Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined.








答案选E。。。。没太看明白题目的逻辑??》。。

谢谢大家!~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-22 15:04:58 | 只看该作者
顶一下~~
板凳
发表于 2010-2-22 15:43:13 | 只看该作者
这题assumption没有明显的gap,所以通过排除他因,即defender。
把所有选项进行取非,如可以成为原文的一个weaken即答案。
答案E 的取非,是在样品被测试前F添加了gold到样品中。weaken了结论,说明是人为问题,而不是methods的问题。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-22 21:18:27 | 只看该作者
这题assumption没有明显的gap,所以通过排除他因,即defender。
把所有选项进行取非,如可以成为原文的一个weaken即答案。
答案E 的取非,是在样品被测试前F添加了gold到样品中。weaken了结论,说明是人为问题,而不是methods的问题。
-- by 会员 andycooler (2010/2/22 15:43:13)



那其他选项呢?排除的原因又是什么?
5#
发表于 2010-2-22 22:24:08 | 只看该作者
Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from Canada’s Kodlunarn Island examined for gold content.  Because high gold content was reported, Elizabeth I funded two mining expeditions.  Neither expedition found any gold there.  Modern analysis of the island’s soil indicates a very low gold content.  Thus the methods used to determine the gold content of Frobisher’s samples must have been inaccurate.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
原文说了两件事:检测金含量的高低,方法是否精确。
A. The gold content of the soil on Kodlunarn Island is much lower today than it was in the sixteenth century. 主干无否定词排除
B. The two mining expeditions funded by Elizabeth I did not mine the same part of Kodlunarn Island. 方法没检查同一个地方
C. The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples provided by Frobisher were different from those generally used in the sixteenth century.主干无否定词排除
D. Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for gold content. any other绝对化
E. Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined. 金没有被添加
剩BE
看B 方法没检查同一个地方和方法是否精确是两回事,你必须要往里加入“是否检查同一个地方”和“这方法时候精确”间的关系才能使B对原文起作用
E 金没有被添加 和原文金含量的高低有关 不用加入自己的想法就获得
选E
6#
发表于 2010-2-23 14:58:04 | 只看该作者
D的错误还在于 说的是F有无别的地的标本 和原文无关
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-23 15:11:35 | 只看该作者
Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from Canada’s Kodlunarn Island examined for gold content.  Because high gold content was reported, Elizabeth I funded two mining expeditions.  Neither expedition found any gold there.  Modern analysis of the island’s soil indicates a very low gold content.  Thus the methods used to determine the gold content of Frobisher’s samples must have been inaccurate.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
原文说了两件事:检测金含量的高低,方法是否精确。
A. The gold content of the soil on Kodlunarn Island is much lower today than it was in the sixteenth century. 主干无否定词排除
B. The two mining expeditions funded by Elizabeth I did not mine the same part of Kodlunarn Island. 方法没检查同一个地方
C. The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples provided by Frobisher were different from those generally used in the sixteenth century.主干无否定词排除
D. Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for gold content. any other绝对化
E. Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined. 金没有被添加
剩BE
看B 方法没检查同一个地方和方法是否精确是两回事,你必须要往里加入“是否检查同一个地方”和“这方法时候精确”间的关系才能使B对原文起作用
E 金没有被添加 和原文金含量的高低有关 不用加入自己的想法就获得
选E
-- by 会员 mobilecdpyn (2010/2/22 22:24:08)



为什么没有否定词就直接排除?
8#
发表于 2010-2-23 15:27:46 | 只看该作者
GWD讲的
9#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-23 15:53:20 | 只看该作者
GWD讲的
-- by 会员 mobilecdpyn (2010/2/23 15:27:46)


你上过他的课?
XDF只讲了百分之七十的题可以这样做....
10#
发表于 2010-2-23 21:40:06 | 只看该作者
video里说not直接干掉
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 05:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部