ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 32243|回复: 34
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教一道逻辑题GWD17-Q11

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-3-2 15:30:13 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
题目如下:
Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species.  Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates.  Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

A.    Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.
B.    It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.
C.    The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.
D.    As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.
E.    In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.
答案是B,不是很懂,望高手指教
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
推荐
发表于 2010-6-2 05:15:48 | 只看该作者
雪鹅数量增加,北极鸟受到威胁。
应该大力捕杀雪鹅来挽救北极鸟。
但是现在的限令说,如果捕杀的雪鹅数量占到了总雪鹅的5%,必须停止捕杀。
所以结论的建议是把限令提高一点,来捕杀更多雪鹅,挽救北极鸟。

减弱的是B
限令提高是个好主意,但是如果最近几年,人们连5%的限令都没有用完,提高限令又有什么作用呢(i.e.减少更多的雪鹅)
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-3-4 12:56:32 | 只看该作者
没人回应吗?自己顶一下~
板凳
发表于 2010-3-9 21:10:10 | 只看该作者
以前的帖子有讨论过,觉得这个解释比较合理:

11. GWD17-Q11:

Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species.Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates.Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.


highlight部分暗含的一个推理是:restriction---->more SG---->threaten other species ,只有B选项指出不是限令导致了雪鹅数量的增长,所以weaken.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?



A.Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.

B.
It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.
自限令使对雪鹅的扑杀提前结束已经很多年了,但雪鹅数量是最近才又一个急剧增长,并对其他鸟类造成威胁,说明并不是限令造成了雪鹅数量的增长,因此取消限令也不会造成其他鸟类物种数量的回升。
这里最关键的是看清题目里的recent sharp increases 和选项里的it had been many years ,时间概念上的转换,需要仔细的阅读题目。




自限令使对雪鹅的扑杀提前结束已经很多年了,但雪鹅数量是最近才又一个急剧增长,并对其他鸟类造成威胁,说明并不是限令造成了雪鹅数量的增长,因此取消限令也不会造成其他鸟类物种数量的回升。
这里最关键的是看清题目里的recent sharp increases 和选项里的it had been many years ,时间概念上的转换,需要仔细的阅读题目。



C.
The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.

D.As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.


E.In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.

其实这道题的结论是把正常推理得到的结论绕了一下,所以很容易让人转不过来,而且关键信息放到里结论那么远的地方,很容易忽略!
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-3-10 20:43:15 | 只看该作者
I see. Thanks a lot!!!
6#
发表于 2010-6-4 19:38:14 | 只看该作者
这题为什么不选D呢??
D说当snowgeese的数量增加了,他们就会recolonized,这样就不会对Arctic birds有威胁了,所以说放宽限令是没必要的

削弱了结论不是??
7#
发表于 2010-6-4 20:35:49 | 只看该作者
up
8#
发表于 2010-6-16 17:34:14 | 只看该作者
A为什么不对?它也强调了Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago~就是限令好多年前就有了,但是鹅的数量是最近才突然间增长的,同样可以削弱啊
9#
发表于 2010-6-16 22:21:41 | 只看该作者
A:限令好多年就有了,但是并没有说明,取消它会对geese的数量到底有什么影响。

B的意思是说:
即使有限令(到了5%就停止捕猎geese),但事实上还没捕杀到5%的时候hunting season就结束了,而且好多年了都是这样。
意思也就是人们没兴趣了,你有没有限令,我就只打猎这么多。你限打10个,我就打2个,你限打100个,我也只打2个,你不限,我还是只打2个。
所以取消限令对geese的数量没有影响。所以weaken。
10#
发表于 2010-7-13 11:15:01 | 只看该作者
这题为什么不选D呢??
D说当snowgeese的数量增加了,他们就会recolonized,这样就不会对Arctic birds有威胁了,所以说放宽限令是没必要的

削弱了结论不是??
-- by 会员 56summer (2010/6/4 19:38:14)



recolonized有可能发生在威胁Arctic birds,displacing birds of less vigorous species之后,所以这个选项有不确定性,GMAT的要求是必要性,所以这个选项不对。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-2 15:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部