ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7375|回复: 20
打印 上一主题 下一主题

天山-7-30

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-11 16:26:00 | 只看该作者

天山-7-30

我认为答案应为A
沙发
发表于 2004-12-11 21:10:00 | 只看该作者

天山-7-Q30:  =  天山-3-Q24:



Each year red-winged blackbirds stop in a certain region of Midland Province on their spring and fall migrations.  In the fall, they eat a significant portion of the province’s sunflower crop.  This year Midland farmers sought permits to set out small amounts of poisoned rice during the blackbirds’spring stop in order to reduce the fall blackbird population.  Some residents voiced concern that the rice could threaten certain species of rare migratory birds.  Nevertheless, the wildlife agency approved the permits.






Which of the following, if true, most helps to justify the wildlife agency’s approval of the permits, given the concerns voiced by some residents?






A.  In the region where the red-winged blackbirds stop, they are the first birds to be present in the spring.



B.   The poison that farmers want to use does not kill birds but rather makes them incapable of producing viable eggs.



C.   Since rice is not raised in Midland Province, few species of birds native to the province normally eat rice.



D.  Without the permit, any farmers shown to have set out poison for the blackbirds would be heavily fined.



E.   The poison that farmers got approval to use has no taste or smell that would make it detectable by birds.


我也认为是A


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-11 21:11:50编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2004-12-11 22:08:00 | 只看该作者
I think the answer is A(changed later, for I do not pay attention to the word migratory birds, not the black bird), although it's not a strong answer, but all of the other choices are irrelevant.
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-11 22:20:22编辑过]
地板
发表于 2004-12-12 01:40:00 | 只看该作者

同意A。

5#
发表于 2004-12-19 17:52:00 | 只看该作者

本来就是A呀!

6#
发表于 2004-12-29 10:13:00 | 只看该作者

为什么不选E呢?

EBIRDS如果认定就是文中所指的RARE MIGRATORY BIRDSE是不是就比A好呢?

因为一直觉得A实在有问题

如果RICE放得很多,远远超于控制BLACKBIRDS的量,那A就根本不能成为答案

请帮我解答疑惑!谢谢
7#
发表于 2004-12-30 04:46:00 | 只看该作者

ding !

please help!

8#
发表于 2005-1-5 06:44:00 | 只看该作者

为什么不是C呢?

文中提到Some residents voiced concern that the rice could threaten certain species of rare migratory birds.

而c中Since rice is not raised in Midland Province, few species of birds native to the province normally eat rice.

正好呼应,正是这些鸟不吃rice,所以residents的concern不用考虑,approve the permits

请讨论,谢谢

9#
发表于 2005-1-7 07:09:00 | 只看该作者

C不好是因为那些居民是认为 the rice could threaten certain species of rare migratory birds,而不是native to


E不好是如果the rice has no taste or smell that would make it detectable by birds,这样根本起不了作用,因为这些birds是包括是需要保护的和要根除的。


可怜我是选C,当时我想如果这些药不会杀死bird,而只减少繁殖,这样对那些需要保护的rare migratory birds就没有影响


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-7 7:09:46编辑过]
10#
发表于 2005-1-14 22:29:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用gwachen在2004-12-29 10:13:00的发言:

为什么不选E呢?


EBIRDS如果认定就是文中所指的RARE MIGRATORY BIRDSE是不是就比A好呢?


因为一直觉得A实在有问题


如果RICE放得很多,远远超于控制BLACKBIRDS的量,那A就根本不能成为答案

请帮我解答疑惑!谢谢

The argument said small amount of poisoned rice.

I did not choose A because of the same reason as you thought.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 03:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部