ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 10100|回复: 21
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-6-6

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-4-22 20:36:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-6-6

According to a theory advanced


       by researcher Paul Martin, the wave


       of species extinctions that occurred


Line in North America about 11,000 years


  (5)      ago, at the end of the Pleistocene era,


can be directly attributed to the arrival


of humans, i.e., the Paleoindians, who


were ancestors of modern Native


Americans.  However, anthropologist


(10)      Shepard Krech points out that large


animal species vanished even in areas


where there is no evidence to demon-


strate that Paleoindians hunted them.


Nor were extinctions confined to large


(15)      animals:  small animals, plants, and


insects disappeared, presumably not


all through human consumption.  Krech


also contradicts Martin’s exclusion of


climatic change as an explanation by


(20)      asserting that widespread climatic


       change did indeed occur at the end of


       the Pleistocene.  Still, Krech attributes


secondary if not primary responsibility


for the extinctions to the Paleoindians,


(25)      arguing that humans have produced


local extinctions elsewhere.  But,


according to historian Richard White,


even the attribution of secondary


responsibility may not be supported


(30)      by the evidence.  White observes that


Martin’s thesis depends on coinciding


dates for the arrival of humans and the


       decline of large animal species, and


Krech, though aware that the dates


(35)      are controversial, does not challenge


them; yet recent archaeological


discoveries are providing evidence


that the date of human arrival was


much earlier than 11,000 years ago.




GWD-6-Q6:


Which of the following, if true, would most weaken Krech’s objections to Martin’s theory?


              



  • Further studies showing that the climatic change that occurred at the end of the Pleistocene era was even more severe and widespread than was previously believed

  • New discoveries indicating that Paleoindians made use of the small animals, plants, and insects that became extinct

  • Additional evidence indicating that widespread climatic change occurred not only at the end of the Pleistocene era but also in previous and subsequent eras

  • Researchers’ discoveries that many more species became extinct in North America at the end of the Pleistocene era than was previously believed

  • New discoveries establishing that both the arrival of humans in North America and the wave of Pleistocene extinctions took place much earlier than 11,000 years ago

  • 答案是B。但是原文说的是 small animals, plants, andinsects disappeared, presumably not all through human consumption.      :那些灭绝的小动物并不是被人类consume掉的。B说的是人类确实consume了那些灭绝的小动物。这个答案怎么能weaken呢?Krech并没有否认人类consume了动物呀。



    当然别的答案也都不好,而且可能只有C还粘点边。

    沙发
    发表于 2005-4-26 14:36:00 | 只看该作者
    First of all, let's look into the clues Krech mentioned:
    1. The large animal species vanished even in the areas where there's no evidence showing Pleistocene once hunted the animals;
    2. Some of the vanished species are not supposed to be consumed by the human.

    The answer B rebuts the clue 2. This sort of rebuttal may be the most typical weakening option.
    板凳
     楼主| 发表于 2005-4-29 21:23:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用xealot在2005-4-26 14:36:00的发言:
    First of all, let's look into the clues Krech mentioned:
    1. The large animal species vanished even in the areas where there's no evidence showing Pleistocene once hunted the animals;
    2. Some of the vanished species are not supposed to be consumed by the human.

    The answer B rebuts the clue 2. This sort of rebuttal may be the most typical weakening option.

    clue 2不是Some of the vanished species are not supposed to be consumed by the human,而是small animals, plants, andinsects disappeared, presumably not all through human consumption.

    地板
    发表于 2005-5-1 09:22:00 | 只看该作者

    同意楼上。我也认为B不对。。。

    可是别的答案也不对啊、、、、

    C说天气变化不仅仅在end of era 也在之前和之后这是加强了M的观点--天气不是影响因素、

    A-说天气在end of era 比之前恶劣。也是加强。

    D和E与题目没什么关系。

    5#
    发表于 2005-5-6 17:07:00 | 只看该作者

    C说天气变化不仅仅在end of era 也在之前和之后这是加强了M的观点--天气不是影响因素、

    加强了M的观点,不就等于削弱了K的观点吗?

    为什么不是C呢?

    6#
    发表于 2005-5-10 17:31:00 | 只看该作者

    C说天气变化不仅仅在end of era 也在之前和之后这是加强了M的观点--天气不是影响因素、


    这不能说明天气不是影响因素,虽然之前之后都有climatic change, 但可能这次的变化可能剧烈enough导致extinction
    7#
    发表于 2005-5-18 10:37:00 | 只看该作者
    为什么不选E?Krech认为气候是个因素,Martin认为气候不是个因素。如果E成立的话,说明气候不是因素了啊,不就weaken了K对M的反对了吗?
    8#
    发表于 2005-5-19 02:26:00 | 只看该作者

    没人理,我接着顶。如果C是对的,E也应该是对的。我觉得B是错的。

    9#
    发表于 2005-5-19 05:46:00 | 只看该作者
    E 也没有说气候的原因啊,只有B最直接。
    10#
    发表于 2005-5-23 22:42:00 | 只看该作者

    I CHOOSE C

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-8 12:45
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部