- UID
- 560127
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-8-27
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
明天考试,恐怖的课程。花儿赶紧发完去看书啦~
【精练】 3. Toxicologist: A survey of oil-refinery workers who work with MBTE, an ingredient currently used in some smog-reducing gasolines, found an alarming incidence of complaints about headaches, fatigue, and shortness of breath. Since gasoline containing MBTE will soon be widely used, we can expect an increased incidence of headaches, fatigue, and shortness of breath. Each of the following, if true, strengthens the toxicologist’s argument EXCEPT: (A) Most oil-refinery workers who do not work with MBTE do not have serious health problems involving headaches, fatigue, and shortness of breath. (B) Headaches, fatigue, and shortness of breath are among the symptoms of several medical conditions that are potentially serious threats to public health. (C) Since the time when gasoline containing MBTE was first introduced in a few metropolitan areas, those areas reported an increase in the number of complaints about headaches, fatigue, and shortness of breath. (D) Regions in which only gasoline containing MBTE is used have a much greater incidence of headaches, fatigue, and shortness of breath than do similar regions in which only MBTEfree gasoline is used. (E) The oil-refinery workers surveyed were carefully selected to be representative of the broader population in their medical histories prior to exposure to MBTE, as well as in other relevant respects.
【逻辑链】 29. (30663-!-item-!-188;#058&005676) To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffocating, a fishing company installed acoustic alarms on all its boats that fish in waters off Massachusetts. The sound emitted temporarily disorients the porpoises and frightens them away. Since the installation of the alarms, the average number of porpoises caught in the company's nets has dropped from eight to one per month. The alarms, therefore, are saving the lives of harbor porpoises in those waters. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? (A) The use of acoustic alarms increases the number of commercial fish caught by the fishing company's boats. (B) When disoriented, harbor porpoises are not significantly more likely to be killed by other boats. (C) Environmentalists advocate the use of acoustic alarms as a means of protecting the harbor porpoise population. (D) The alarms were installed at the time of year when harbor porpoises are most plentiful in the Massachusetts waters. (E) The cost of installing acoustic alarms on fishing boats is less than the cost of repairing nets damaged by harbor porpoises. 30. (31171-!-item-!-188;#058&006066) An advertising agency must leave its office building. To save overhead costs, it is considering setting up a "virtual office" instead of moving to an adjacent office building. Employees will do their work on computers, as they do now, but will do so at home, sharing their work with colleagues by communicating text and designs to colleagues' computers through telephone lines, receiving typed comments, and then revising the work until it is satisfactory. Which of the following, if true, indicates a disadvantage of the virtual office plan? (A) The agency can move its computers and associated equipment into employees' homes without purchasing any new equipment or requiring employees to purchase such equipment. (B) To reach the current office building and return home, employees spend an average of one and a half hours per day commuting, usually in heavy traffic. (C) The employees of the advertising agency are accustomed to autonomy in monitoring their own progress and productivity. (D) Employees would be able to adapt quickly to using computers in a virtual office setting, since employees' current use of computers to produce designs requires a high level of skill. (E) Expressions and gestures in face-to-face exchanges are an important aid to employees in gauging the viability of new ideas they have proposed. 31. (31265-!-item-!-188;#058&006121) The symptoms that United States President Zachary Taylor began showing five days before his death are consistent with arsenic poisoning. Recent examination of Taylor's bones, however, revealed levels of arsenic comparable to those found in the bones of Taylor's contemporaries. These levels are much lower than the levels of arsenic that remain in the bones of arsenic poisoning victims who live for more than a day after ingesting a lethal dose of the poison. Which of the following is most strongly supported by the statements given? (A) The symptoms that Taylor began showing five days before his death are consistent with poisoning other than arsenic poisoning. (B) Taylor's death was not the result of any kind of poisoning. (C) The symptoms that Taylor began showing five days before his death were not caused by a lethal dose of arsenic. (D) The symptoms that Taylor began showing five days before his death grew more severe each day. (E) It is unusual for a person who has ingested a lethal dose of arsenic to survive for more than a day. 32. (31313-!-item-!-188;#058&006235) Paleontologist: About 2.8 million years ago, many species that lived near the ocean floor suffered substantial population declines. These declines coincided with the onset of an ice age. The notion that cold killed those bottom-dwelling creatures outright is misguided, however; temperatures near the ocean floor would have changed very little. Nevertheless, the cold probably did cause the population declines, though indirectly. Many bottom-dwellers depended for food on plankton, small organisms that lived close to the surface and sank to the bottom when they died. Most probably, the plankton suffered a severe population decline as a result of sharply lower temperatures at the surface, depriving many bottom-dwellers of food. In the paleontologist's reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles? (A) The first introduces the hypothesis proposed by the paleontologist; the second is a judgment offered in spelling out that hypothesis. (B) The first introduces the hypothesis proposed by the paleontologist; the second is a position that the paleontologist opposes. (C) The first is an explanation challenged by the paleontologist; the second is an explanation proposed by the paleontologist. (D) The first is a judgment advanced in support of a conclusion reached by the paleontologist; the second is that conclusion. (E) The first is a generalization put forward by the paleontologist; the second presents certain exceptional cases in which that generalization does not hold.
|
|