ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2367|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

逻辑-大全-B1 急求NN解答!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-3-22 09:24:05 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the chairman of a corporation to the stockholders.
A number of charges have been raised against me, some serious, some trivial. Individuals seeking to control the corporation for their own purposes have demanded my resignation. Remember that no court of law in any state has found me guilty of any criminal offense whatsoever. In the American tradition, as you know, an individual is considered innocent until proven guilty. Furthermore, as the corporation’s unbrokensix-yearrecord of growth will show, my conduct of my official duties as chairman has only helped enhance the success of the corporation, and so benefited every stockholder.
Which of the following can be properly inferred from the excerpt?
(A) The chairman believes that all those who have demanded his resignation are motivated by desire to control the corporation for their own purposes.
(B) Any misdeeds that the chairman may have committed were motivated by his desire to enhance the success of the corporation.
(C) The chairman is innocent of any criminal offense.
(D) The corporation has expanded steadily over the past sixyears.
(E) Any legal proceedings against the chairman have resulted in his acquittal.

大全给的答案是D。

我觉得D必然是错的啊~~~~题干“unbrokensix-yearrecord of growth ”  只是说六年不破的成长记录,却不能反映公司“expanded steadily”啊。  这个steadily实在太······

另外,C为什么不对?
前面已经说“no court of law in any state has found me guilty of any criminal offense  ”  ,接着又说“considered innocent”,那么理应
可以推导出这个人是innocent的啊?

E也有同样的疑惑。

望斑竹解答~  ><  小女子感激不尽~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-3-22 10:22:40 | 只看该作者
第一感觉是D,但仔细看了之后也说不上C错在哪里,可能C说的太绝对了,chairman是否innocent不应该是听他自己说的
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-23 08:37:52 | 只看该作者
第一感觉是D,但仔细看了之后也说不上C错在哪里,可能C说的太绝对了,chairman是否innocent不应该是听他自己说的
-- by 会员 chhldeng (2011/3/22 10:22:40)




好吧···C确实有点绝对。

依然觉得steadily这个词语是有问题的。

如果考试的时候遇到这种情况应该怎么解决?
地板
发表于 2011-3-23 16:21:04 | 只看该作者
这里考的时充分条件,就是从文章提供的信息中必然会得出的结论。

C中说,如果未被法院认定有罪的人会被considered innocent, 但这个人本身不一定innocent, 所以C不对。
E中的信息根本没在文中体现,不要误以为说的司法事件跟这件事有关。而且,一个人可能发生的诉讼很多种,个人借贷、离婚、遗产继承等个人的案件不可能导致他辞职。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-23 20:33:56 | 只看该作者
谢谢解答!
6#
发表于 2011-6-5 11:47:04 | 只看该作者
为什么不是A呢? 因为原句里面有这样一句话: Individuals seeking to control the corporation for their own purposes have demanded my resignation.  所以就不能算推论么?
7#
发表于 2011-6-6 20:00:06 | 只看该作者
steadily和unbroken呼应啊!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-18 02:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部