ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 17822|回复: 53
打印 上一主题 下一主题

MBA让你成为更好的CEO.....Or Not?

[精华] [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-3-13 23:35:15 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
一月份的Harvard Business Review上对世界上业绩最好的50名CEO做了份排名。见以下下载链接。
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=ZDGBIRSG

INSEAD 的 CEO Ranking Database
http://knowledge.insead.edu/top-ceos.cfm
http://www.insead.edu/media_relations/press_release/2009_CEOrankings.cfm

紧接着,这份研究的作者在BW上撰文《Why Do MBAs Make Better CEOs?》
http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/content/feb2010/bs20100218_190012.htm

我认为里面的结论非常弱:

    For some graduates, an MBA simply gives them better skills. It can add right-brain creativity and warmth to left-brain logic and financial acumen. Or vice versa. It can even help get the hard and soft skills working together.
    For others, an MBA is a badge of excellence. After all, top schools only accept a chosen few. And most top companies look among the elite for their leaders.
    An MBA may also provide a network of other rising stars. This network offers business contacts, opportunities, and priceless advice. And it lasts for an entire career.
 各位有什么高见?还是觉得MBA本身就是loser的游戏?拍砖吧。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-3-13 23:45:19 | 只看该作者
钱德勒同学也开贴啦.....无论如何支持一把

可能我这么说会很极端,但是我觉得,如果真的发展很好的人是不会考虑读MBA的,不管你是否承认,你动这个念头,尤其还想折腾去国外读的,尤其还是一把年纪的,基本上,都是对现状不满意的但是又拼命想改变的人.

所以是不是LOSER,我不确定,但是至少,在决定读书的时候还不是真正的成功者.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-3-13 23:49:55 | 只看该作者
钱德勒同学也开贴啦.....无论如何支持一把

可能我这么说会很极端,但是我觉得,如果真的发展很好的人是不会考虑读MBA的,不管你是否承认,你动这个念头,尤其还想折腾去国外读的,尤其还是一把年纪的,基本上,都是对现状不满意的但是又拼命想改变的人.

所以是不是LOSER,我不确定,但是至少,在决定读书的时候还不是真正的成功者.
-- by 会员 amorela (2010/3/13 23:45:19)


谢谢捧场。

我觉得你说的一点不极端。

"That is, we measured the performance of chief executives over their entire time in office, rather than focusing on the last year—or worse, the last quarter. As part of the analysis, we evaluated the impact of having an MBA on a CEO's overall position in the ranking. This gave us fascinating data to contribute to the great MBA debate."

1999名被研究的CEO被shortlist后,只有不到1/3的人有MBA。。。。

-----------------------------------------------------

Why Do MBAs Make Better CEOs?
An MBA really does help a CEO to add value. At least, that's what a recent INSEAD study suggests. The more difficult question is why


By Herminia Ibarra, Morten T. Hansen, and Urs Peyer
MBA programs have taken a lot of criticism over the last year or two. According to naysayers, they are guilty of many crimes: teaching the wrong financial models, riding roughshod over risk management, sidestepping business ethics, overheating the managerial job market, hiding from the real world, and cloistering students in academe.As a result, so the script goes, we have a generation of business leaders tainted by greed and short-term thinking.Hence, the recent global economic crisis. Oh, and remember Jeff Skilling of Enron? He had an MBA, while Bill Gates and Steve Jobs didn't even finish college.

Now, we enjoy a good debate. And we're ready to take criticism on the chin. But we also prefer analysis to anecdote.

In our ranking of the 100 best-performing CEOs in the world, published in the January February issue of the Harvard Business Review
, we sought to judge the performance of business leaders in a new way by focusing on objective gauges of long-term performance. That is, we measured the performance of chief executives over their entire time in office, rather than focusing on the last year—or worse, the last quarter. As part of the analysis, we evaluated the impact of having an MBA on a CEO's overall position in the ranking. This gave us fascinating data to contribute to the great MBA debate.

Not a Necessity

Initially, we'd hoped we could analyze our whole sample of 1,999 CEOs from the world's top companies for the effects of an MBA on their ranking position. Remember, our data was based on long-term performance—to be precise, return on shareholder investment and change in market capitalization over a chief executive's entire tenure. If business schools encouraged short-term thinking and unfettered greed, then having an MBA would surely be correlated with a low ranking. At this point we were keeping an open mind.

While information about educational credentials wasn't in the public domain for all countries, CEOs' academic records were widely available in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the U.S. That left us with 1,109 of our original 1,999 to analyze—still a sizable sample and statistically significant enough to work with.

Fewer than one-third of the CEOs in our reduced sample of four countries had an MBA. So let's be clear. We're certainly not saying it's a necessity for getting the top job. But it could still be sufficient to improve performance.

As it turns out, we found a definite correlation between holding an MBA and achieving high performance as a CEO over the long term. In our list, CEOs with an MBA ranked on average a full 40 places higher than those without. Indeed, half of our top 10 went to B-school (although, admittedly, one of them dropped out before getting an MBA).

What does that mean in terms of performance? CEOs without MBAs had average shareholder return of 81% over the course of their entire tenure, while those with MBAs averaged total returns of 93%, a substantial improvement.

Next we looked at those who had become CEO before the age of 50. The effect of an MBA was even more significant for this group. The advantage went up from 40 places to 100. Our study controlled for a great many other variables that might have explained the superior MBA performance: industry, company size, the CEO's starting year, even prior company performance (to guard against the possibility that MBAs fared better, for example, by selectively choosing companies that were already doing well). Time and again, the MBA advantage persisted.

Magic MBA Ingredient
The big question is, why? The simple answer is that something in the MBA curriculum or experience helps a CEO add value, particularly if that executive has comparatively few years of business experience. But what exactly is this magic MBA ingredient? Here, we're forced to part from our data and speculate.

For some graduates, an MBA simply gives them better skills. It can add right-brain creativity and warmth to left-brain logic and financial acumen. Or vice versa. It can even help get the hard and soft skills working together.

For others, an MBA is a badge of excellence. After all, top schools only accept a chosen few. And most top companies look among the elite for their leaders.

An MBA may also provide a network of other rising stars. This network offers business contacts, opportunities, and priceless advice. And it lasts for an entire career.

So far, so good. When we blogged about our findings on hbr.org, several readers suggested a less obvious but equally convincing advantage. Those who choose to do an MBA, the readers said, are opting to improve themselves. Their openness to ideas and willingness to learn is going to benefit them all the way to the top—and long after they arrive in the executive suite.

We'd like to add a final suggestion of our own. Our ranking shows that no country or industry has a monopoly on excellence. This indicates that business leaders ought to look outward—to new geographies and sectors—for role models. An MBA program, or at least a good one, gives just such a perspective, especially if it recruits a globally diverse student body. And here our speculation is backed up by research. An INSEAD colleague, Professor Will Maddux, has carried out experiments demonstrating conclusively that the simple fact of having lived abroad makes people more creative.

The most successful MBA graduates are probably those who manage to mix all of the above ingredients into a potent cocktail of excellence. Perhaps they're the ones who made it into our top 200. Today's MBA students should take note.

Herminia Ibarra is a professor of organizational behavior and the Cora Chaired Professor of Leadership and Learning at INSEAD, the international business school with campuses in France, Singapore and Abu Dhabi. Morten T. Hansen is a management professor at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Information, and at INSEAD. Urs Peyer is an associate professor of finance at INSEAD.
地板
发表于 2010-3-13 23:54:27 | 只看该作者
我觉得,很多SKILL和KNOWLEDGE不是书本或者课堂里可以学到的.

MBA出来是好的打工者,这毫无疑问.是professional manager.但是真正的能不能成为JOBS或者Welch那样的人,我觉得最终取决于你的personality和对世界的认知能力.而这两个,却不完全是MBA可以给我们的,这些是来自于生活的阅历和经历.至少,我是这么认为的.
5#
发表于 2010-3-14 00:06:29 | 只看该作者
纯顶!
6#
发表于 2010-3-14 00:14:30 | 只看该作者
同意ls的。我没啥野心,就像做个不错的 打工者呵呵
7#
发表于 2010-3-14 00:16:25 | 只看该作者
MBA从某种意义上来说可以认为是投资。
另外,我觉得是Loser还是winner,看你个人目标,如果你想成为Welch那样的人,MBA没多大作用,我现在500强,公司的大中华区总裁到部门总经理,没有几个是MBA毕业的。
MBA不是一定可以帮助我达成自己制定的目标,但起码创造了一个机会给我,但是在现在的工作岗位上是没有这样的机会的!

以上只是个人的观点!欢迎拍砖!
8#
发表于 2010-3-14 00:18:36 | 只看该作者
我觉得从MBA 中的收获很多时候取决于我们进去的时候想要得到什么。 我不止一次听人说(包括面试我的校友), 在MBA 学不到什么, 就是去找个好工作, 跟同学混一下。 真的吗? 聚集了全球最好的师资, 研究的商学院就只是给我们找工作用的吗? 我想说, 如果你进去的时候是一杯满满的水, 那你可能确实学不到什么。 如果你进去的时候是一块海绵, that might be a different story.
9#
发表于 2010-3-14 00:49:36 | 只看该作者
钱德勒同学也开贴啦.....无论如何支持一把

可能我这么说会很极端,但是我觉得,如果真的发展很好的人是不会考虑读MBA的,不管你是否承认,你动这个念头,尤其还想折腾去国外读的,尤其还是一把年纪的,基本上,都是对现状不满意的但是又拼命想改变的人.

所以是不是LOSER,我不确定,但是至少,在决定读书的时候还不是真正的成功者.
-- by 会员 amorela (2010/3/13 23:45:19)


不能同意你更多。
10#
发表于 2010-3-14 01:03:26 | 只看该作者


不能同意你更多。
-- by 会员 酒楼 (2010/3/14 0:49:36)



哦也!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

NTU MBA

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-8 01:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部