Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered numerous detailed mosaics depicting several readily identifiable animal species: a hare, a partridge, and various Mediterranean fish. Oddly, most of the species represented did not live in the Sepphoris region when these mosaics were created. Since identical motifs appear in mosaics found in other Roman cities, however, the mosaics of Sepphoris were very likely created by traveling artisans from some other part of the Roman Empire. S城的挖掘中出土了很多镶嵌图案画了很多可以辨认的动物种类。奇怪的是,大部分这些动物都不生活在S城。因为同样的图案也出现在其他城市,S城的图案很可能是其他城市的工匠旅行时创作的。 Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? - The Sepphoris mosaics are not composed exclusively of types of stones found naturally in the Sepphoris area.
- There is no single region to which all the species depicted in the Sepphoris mosaics are native.
- No motifs appear in the Sepphoris mosaics that do not also appear in the mosaics of some other Roman city.
- All of the animal figures in the Sepphoris mosaics are readily identifiable as representations of known species.
- There was not a common repertory of mosaic designs with which artisans who lived in various parts of the Roman Empire were familiar.
搜索过了没有讨论。 正确答案是E,其他答案都可以用排除法排除,但是E的意思我看不明白,请指点!
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-5-23 23:38:48编辑过] |