LSAT 2002 10 SECTION I 第14题

yzlinlin · 发表于 2003-11-26 02:48:00

14. Thirty years ago, the percentage of the British people who vacationed in foreign countries was very small compared with the large percentage of the British population who travel abroad for vacations now. Foreign travel is, and always has been, expensive from Britain. Therefore, British people must have, on average, more money to spend on vacations now than they did 30 years ago.
The argument requires assuming which one of the following?
(A) If foreign travel had been less expensive 30 years ago, British people would still not have had enough money to take vacation abroad.
(B) If travel to Britain were less expensive, more people of other countries would travel to Britain for their vacations.
(C) If the percentage of British people vacationing abroad was lower 30 years ago, then the British people of 30 years ago must have spent more money on domestic vacations.
(D) If more of the British people 30 years ago had had enough money to vacation abroad, more would have done so.
(E) If British people are now wealthier than they were 30 years ago, then they must have more money to spend on vacations now than they did 30 years ago.

答案D。感觉E也有道理。请问E错在哪？

深海的小美人鱼 · 发表于 2003-11-26 04:02:00

E) If British people are now wealthier than they were 30 years ago, then they must have more money to spend on vacations now than they did 30 years ago.
注意这里的must不对。而且有钱未必就把钱花在旅游上

wangdaya · 发表于 2004-4-12 17:33:00

问题是：The argument requires assuming which one of the following?

那么E的答案反了，应该假设If they have more money to spend on vacations now than they did 30 years ago. then
British people are now wealthier than they were 30 years ago,
多玩＝》钱多方妥。

LSAT 2002 10 SECTION I 第14题

LSAT 2002 10 SECTION I 第14题

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块