ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1452|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请指教:大全7-13.谢谢~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-4-15 16:01:55 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
The recent decline in the value of the dollar was triggered by a prediction of slower economic growth in the coming year. But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government’s huge budget deficit, which must therefore be decreased to prevent future currency declines.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion about how to prevent future currency declines ?
(A) The government has made little attempt to reduce the budget deficit.
(B) The budget deficit has not caused a slowdown in economic growth.
(C) The value of the dollar declined several times in the year prior to the recent prediction of slower economic growth.
(D) Before there was a large budget deficit, predictions of slower economic growth frequently caused declines in the dollar’s value.
正选是D。句意没看明白,尤其是第二句:"But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government’s huge budget deficit,",有哪位达人给解释一下?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-4-15 16:18:50 | 只看该作者
但是这种预期不会出现对美元的不良影响(贬值),如果政府不出现巨大的财政赤字。

意思是必须先存在巨大财政赤字的情况下,才会发生美元贬值的预期。这句也是结论。

D,说往往在赤字出现之前,经济衰退的预期已经造成美元贬值了。刚好推翻了。

反驳结论,本题,我觉得至少答案要提到“财政赤字”。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-15 16:50:44 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼上的解答:-)
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 03:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部