ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?

Twenty percent of the stores in Morganville's downtown shopping district will fail within five years because they will be competing directly with the SaveMart discount department store newly opened in East Morganville. The downtown shopping district has lost business at this rate before and has always completely rebounded. Confidence that it will rebound again from the losses it is now about to suffer is ill founded, however, because __________.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2423|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助prep破解里的一道题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-4-2 20:57:02 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?
Twenty percent of the stores in Morganville's downtown shopping district will fail within five years because they will be competing directly with the SaveMart discount department store newly opened in East Morganville.  The downtown shopping district has lost business at this rate before and has always completely rebounded.  Confidence that it will rebound again from the losses it is now about to suffer is ill founded, however, because __________.
A. the stores likely to be put out of business by direct competition from SaveMart are the downtown shopping district's anchor stores, on whose ability to draw shoppers many of the other downtown stores depend
B. the bus line that has long connected the downtown area of Morganville with East Morganville has a tradition of carrying shoppers who reside in East Morganville into downtown Morganville to shop
C. when the downtown shopping district has rebounded before, the business premises of a failed business were typically taken over by a business of the same kind as had been there before
D. SaveMart's business plan for the East Morganville store is based on earning low profits, if any, during the first five years of the store's existence
E. it is conceivable that the downtown shopping district could shrink substantially without collapsing altogether
哪位能清楚地解释一下为什么答案是A?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-4-2 23:06:47 | 只看该作者
原文的结论是 downtown shopping district  以前收到挑战但是又completely rebound ,而这次 downtown shopping district   可能不会rebound了。
A选项指出这次是这个district的老大受到挑战,可能会倒闭,而该地区很多shop都是depend这个老大的,所以这次可能不会rebound了。(有点擒贼先擒王的感觉。。。)

PS 我觉得读完题后首先能想为什么这次就不会rebound了?那肯定是这次的挑战与以往不同,然后顺着这个思路看选项。A描述了这次挑战的特点,也就是与以往的不同了。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-2 23:56:23 | 只看该作者
谢谢!!我开始的理解有点失误。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 01:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部