ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5352|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[逻辑小分队] 揽瓜阁 逻辑做题小分队Day135

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2021-10-20 19:36:58 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
请大家在本帖回复:
1. 文章大概结构
2. 自己写的答案

解析+文章翻译明晚微信群里公布

报名活动,加微信号killgmat
Editorial: It is absurd to suppose that getting motorists to switch to electrically-powered automobiles will significantly reduce carbon emissions. Batteries have to be charged, and the electricity to charge them is almost certainly going to be produced by the burning of fossil fuels, A process that inevitably Creates carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide as by-products.
Which of the following would, if true, be most effective rebuttal of the editorial’s criticism?
A The smaller the number of locations at which carbon emissions occur, the easier it is to have carbon captured and sequester carbon emissions produced by the process.
B Most people insist that they would be willing to pay more for electrically-powered vehicles if they believed that widespread use of such vehicles would protect the environment.
C Carbon emissions produced in the manufacture of petroleum by-products constitute nearly one-half of all greenhouse gases produced by human industrial activity.
D Studies have shown that the less pollution people believe automobiles to produce, the longer distances they will tend to drive them.
E Although carbon emissions are most plentiful greenhouse gases, other such gases are more harmful per unit of weight.


After recent hurricanes produced tremendous damage there, Mardin County revised its building code. In doing so, Mardin imposed stricter standards for roofing but not for windows. The revision will undoubtedly reduce the principal cause of property damage, namely rainwater coming through damaged roofs. However, the revision will do little to prevent personal injuries, since, while many injuries are caused by flying debris breaking through windows, very few are caused by roof collapse or rainwater.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weaken the argument?
(A) For many years Mardin County's building code has imposed a stricter standard for windows than that imposed by most counties that are frequently struck by hurricanes.
(B) The hurricanes that recently hit Mardin County were not as severe as some hurricanes that have hit there in the past 100 years.
(C) Much of the flying debris carried by the winds of a hurricane is roof material that has become dislodged.
(D) During a hurricane, broken windows in a house cause increased pressure inside the house that can, in turn, cause the roof of the house to become damaged.
(E) Mardin County's building code applies to the repair of houses in addition to the construction of new houses.


参考答案:AC

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
沙发
发表于 2021-10-20 23:05:19 发自手机 Web 版 | 只看该作者
ad
板凳
发表于 2021-10-21 00:34:17 发自手机 Web 版 | 只看该作者
ac
地板
发表于 2021-10-21 12:48:41 发自 iPhone | 只看该作者
111
5#
发表于 2021-10-21 16:09:54 | 只看该作者
AC
6#
发表于 2021-10-21 23:40:19 | 只看该作者
aa
7#
发表于 2021-10-22 03:52:55 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!               
8#
发表于 2021-10-22 09:58:54 | 只看该作者
1、因为给电动汽车的电池充电也是通过燃烧化石能源、会造成碳排放,所以让司机使用电动汽车来减少碳排放的做法是荒谬的。问weaken
思考:因果论证,考虑他因削弱。

A:碳排放的地点越少,越容易将碳捕捉。正确,电动汽车开车时并不会产生碳,而传统汽车开车时也会产生碳,发电过程碳排放的地点更少,更容易捕捉碳。
B:如果人们相信使用电动汽车有利于环境,他们就愿意为电动汽车多花钱。无关碳排放的问题。
C:汽油副产品生产过程中的碳排放占到了温室气体的一半。迷惑选项,选项想说那传统汽油车使用的汽油产生的碳排放也很多,但是选项并没有对比电产生的碳排放,所以还是不知道谁多谁少。
D:人们相信如果车产生的污染越少,他们开的路程就越多。无关。
E:即使碳排放是温室气体的大头,其他的温室气体危害更大。无关。

选A

2、M城市要求房屋加固、但没要求窗户加固,而打破窗户进来的碎片会造成人受伤,所以这个规定只保护了财产,没有保护人们安全。
问weaken
思考:因果论证,考虑削弱因果联系或他因削弱。

A:M城市对窗户的规定已经比别的城市严格很多了。比较维度无关。
B:最近的飓风没有100年前飓风严重。比较维度无关。
C:风中的碎片是屋顶坍塌造成的。正确,所以房屋加固后,就不会造成碎片,也不会造成人受伤。
D:窗户碎了会导致屋顶坍塌。方向反了,更说明要加固窗户了。
E:规定的应用范围包括老房子和新房子。无关。

选C
9#
发表于 2021-10-22 18:21:51 | 只看该作者
cc
10#
发表于 2021-10-22 19:55:07 | 只看该作者
DAY135
1. Weaken A
【P】电池要充电,电是燃烧燃料供应的,这个过程会产生许多碳排放
【C】让M用电车不会减少碳排放
A 碳排放在越集中的地方发生,就越能capture并process(就能减少污染)√
B 许多人称他们愿意多花一点钱买电动车,只要电动车可以减少碳排放 无关
C Petroleum工厂碳排放将近人造的一半的温室气体 无关比较       
D 研究表明人认为车会排放越少的污染,他们就会开越久 增强选项,表明确实不能减少污染
E 尽管碳排放是最多的温室气体,其他气体更有害 无关比较不能削弱
2. Weaken C
【P】:MC在H后修改了建筑形式,加强了屋顶标准但没有加强窗户标准,以减少财产损害。
【C】:这个改变无法减少个人伤害,因为很多人被窗的FB伤到而不是屋顶坍塌       
A M对窗的标准比其他大多数国家要求都高 ,无关比较M和其他国家       
B 无关比较,最近的H没有比一百年前的更严重,不选       
C FB不是来自窗而是屋顶碎片,削弱了,修正屋顶标准就能减少人被FB伤害到       
D 破窗会使得屋顶更容易坍塌,增强了,所以只改变屋顶要求没用,窗更重要       
E 没有讨论repair 而是这个改变能不能减少对人的伤害       
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 03:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部