ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable income, a vicious cycle results. Tax evasion forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates, which causes the tax burden on nonevading taxpayers to become heavier. This, in turn, encourages even more taxpayers to evade income taxes by hiding taxable income.

The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true?

正确答案: C

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2320|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求NN帮忙解释紫皮OG70题-之前帖子解释寥寥无几

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-8-5 20:49:00 | 只看该作者

求NN帮忙解释紫皮OG70题-之前帖子解释寥寥无几

when people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable income, a vicious cycle results.Tax evasion forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates, which causes the tax burden on non-evading taxpayers to become heavier. This in turn encourages even more taxpayers to evade income taxes by hiding taxable income

The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true?

A. An increase in tax rates tends to function as an incentive for taxpayers to try to increase their pretax incomes

B. Some methods for detecting tax evaders, and thus recovering some tax revenue lost through evasion, bring in more than they cost, but their success rate vareis from year to year

C. When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue, they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion

D. No one who routinely hides some taxable income can be induced by a lowering of tax rates to stop hiding such income unless fines for evaders are raised at the same time.

E. Taxpayers do not differ from each other with respect to the rate of taxation that will cause them to evade taxes

OG 解释怎么也看不懂..其实这道题目我就有点不理解..C选项的“they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion”作何理解呢?

OG说when considering income tax rates in the first place, lawmakers must not take into account the amount of revenue that will inevitably be lost to evasion,不懂...

请求NN帮助~

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-5 21:46:00 | 只看该作者
哪位好心人帮帮忙吧~
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-9 10:38:00 | 只看该作者

这么久都没有回复呵...大家帮帮我吧...感激不尽了!!

地板
发表于 2009-8-9 10:58:00 | 只看该作者

Assumption题。

C: 在为了实现一定税收收入的时候,lawmaker不会把某些人通过避税带来的损失计算在内。

取非:在为了实现一定税收收入的时候,lawmaker会把某些人通过避税带来的损失计算在内。如果这样,lawmaker就不用提高税率了。

PS: Allow...for...

If you allow a particular length of time or a particular amount of something for a particular purpose, you include it in your planning.


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/8/9 10:58:20编辑过]
5#
发表于 2009-8-9 13:32:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得是,如果政府充分考虑到了提高税率会带来更多的由于逃税带来的损失,那么他就不会提高税率了
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-9 16:10:00 | 只看该作者
非常谢谢二位! 原来是我把这道题想复杂了...
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-29 15:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部