急!求助GWD25-2也是本月JJ

GWD25-Q2.

In two months, the legal minimum wage in the country of Kirlandia will increase

from five Kirlandic dollars(KD5.00) Per hour to KD5.50 per hour. Opponents of

this increase have argued that the resulting rise in wages will drive the inflation

rate up. In fact its impact on wages will probably be negligible, since only a

very small proportion of all Kirfandic workers are currently receiving less than

KD5.50 per hour.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? B

A. Most people in kirlandia who are currently earning the minimum wage have

  been employed at their current jobs for less than a year.

B. Some firms in Kirlandia have paid workers considerably less than KD5.00

  per hour, in violation of kirlandic employment regulations.

C. Many businesses hire trainees at or near the minimum wage but must

  reward trained workers by keeping their pay levels above the pay level

  of trainees.

D. The greatest growth in Kirlandia’s economy in recent years has been in

   those sectors where workers earn wages that tend to be much higher

   than the minimum wage.

E The current minimum wage is insufficient for a worker holding only one job 

to earn enough to support a family ,even when working full time at that job.

这道题给的参考答案是B,但我怎么觉得是C呢?

B:有些公司非法经营给员工的工资低于最低工资,既然非法了,新的规定下它还是会继续非法呀

C:培训者的工资作为参考工资,员工工资不能低于培训者,那么当培训者工资增加,当然员工工资也增加了

NN请帮我看一下!周三要考了

我觉得B里面的SOME不好,感觉只是片面的,而C里的MANY好像更好一些.JUST MY 2 CENTS.请教NN指正.

支持Ｂ，原文逻辑是反对者认为工资上调会造成通货膨胀，也就是物价上涨的速度大于工资上涨的速度，但作者的态度是既然很少（注意，是很少）的工人的工资低于５.５Ｄ，那么物价上涨对于拿这些工资的工人的总体生活水平的影响不大

削弱的化应该针对结论，工资上调并不是结论啊，所以ＬＳ说的他因削弱可能有些问题

Ｂ选项认为some（some>only a small proportion)甚至低于了５ＫＤ，那么物价上涨对这些人而言显然是不公平的

个人见解，请ＮＮ们指教