ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5953|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-B-17请教UNLESS

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-11-16 23:47:00 | 只看该作者

大全-B-17请教UNLESS

17.   Ronald: According to my analysis of the national economy, housing prices should not increase during the next six months unless interest rates drop significantly.


Mark: I disagree. One year ago, when interest rates last fell significantly, housing prices did not increase at all.


It can be inferred from the conversation above that Mark has interpreted Ronald’s statement to mean that


(A) housing prices will rise only if interest rates fall


(B) if interest rates fall, housing prices must rise


(C) interest rates and housing prices tend to rise and fall together


(D) interest rates are the only significant economic factor affecting housing pricesB


(E) interest rates are likely to fall significantly in the next six months


答案是B,我的问题是,NOT A ,UNLESS B 的关系应该是A-->B吧(这是XDF书上写的),也就是HP的上升推出IR的下降


IF A THEN B,是A-->B,答案B也就是IR下降-->HP上升


1.HP的上升推出IR的下降


2.IR下降-->HP上升    能相等???还是我对UNLESS的理解有问题?或者是钻牛角尖?


题目是做对的选的是B,但是我用关系一推觉得有问题,有点乱。请牛人指教.感觉思路还是比能做题目重要很多。谢谢.

沙发
发表于 2004-11-17 09:40:00 | 只看该作者

1。你对UNLESS的理解正确(其它充分必要条件指示词见“充分必要条件指示词”:LAWYER)

2。R的意思: housing prices  increase ---->interest rates drop

    M举反对(disagree)R的例子:去年 interest rates  fell ,housing prices did not increase 。

3。M举的例子反对不了R,它只能反对interest rates  fell------>housing prices  increase。也即M实际上误认为R的意思为interest rates  fell------>housing prices  increase。即B

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-11-17 10:12:00 | 只看该作者
SOGA,谢谢lawyer_1
地板
发表于 2004-11-28 14:23:00 | 只看该作者

那我也想请教一下,按XDF的书上说

A, UNLESS B 应该为 非A-》B或者, 非B-》A,

那这里是不是可以除了楼上的理解HP升-》IR DROP,还可以说 IR INCREASE->HP DROP 呢?

5#
发表于 2004-11-29 05:24:00 | 只看该作者
Upppppppppppppp
6#
发表于 2004-12-4 16:06:00 | 只看该作者
为什么没有人给我们解答呢?
7#
发表于 2004-12-4 23:39:00 | 只看该作者

实际上R的意思正是房价上涨——》利率下降

但M误解了R的意思,误认为:利率下降——》房价上涨,正是B选项

8#
发表于 2005-2-15 12:18:00 | 只看该作者

Thanks. I finally got it.

This question asks  what has Mark interpreted Ronald’s statement to mean, not what Ronald mean.

9#
发表于 2005-6-24 18:51:00 | 只看该作者

Actually, Ronald's words are not important in this question, but the Mark's interpretation is.


Mark disagrees to a statement. The statement = Mark's interpretation of Ronald's words--> the answer


Therefore, to find this answer, we can just invert Mark's words : "One years ago ..........", and know what Mark disagree to.


  "One years ago,when interest rates last fell significantly,housing prices didn't increase at all."  Mark cited the statement to weaken "if interest rates fall,housing prices must rise" -> Mark's interpretation of Ronald's words.


So, we just need to find what Mark disagrees to. That's the answer.

10#
发表于 2006-7-29 15:54:00 | 只看该作者
up
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 02:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部