大全－Ｂ－17请教ＵＮＬＥＳＳ

zhch1222

我有点糊涂, 题干Mark has interpreted Ronald’s statement to mean that指得是M的理解(M to mean that)还是R的理解(R to mean that)阿?
我做题时以为是M的理解,结果没有正确答案.看大家的意思好像都是认为是R的理解。

buda

还是lawyer厉害，一说就明白了。

M举的例子反对不了R，它只能反对interest rates fell------>housing prices increase。也即M实际上误认为R的意思为interest rates fell------>housing prices increase。豁然开朗。

zhuceg

以下是引用lochin在2005-6-24 18:51:00的发言：

Actually, Ronald's words are not important in this question, but the Mark's interpretation is.

Mark disagrees to a statement. The statement = Mark's interpretation of Ronald's words--> the answer

Therefore, to find this answer, we can just invert Mark's words : "One years ago ..........", and know what Mark disagree to.

  "One years ago,when interest rates last fell significantly,housing prices didn't increase at all."  Mark cited the statement to weaken "if interest rates fall,housing prices must rise" -> Mark's interpretation of Ronald's words.

So, we just need to find what Mark disagrees to. That's the answer.

觉得还是这个方法快捷，A->B, B->A 之类的方法估计考试的时候用会比较费时。