ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1282|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大家來確認一下本月JJ CR直升機那道題的選項答案

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-4-11 18:00:00 | 只看该作者

大家來確認一下本月JJ CR直升機那道題的選項答案

一個地方的政府為了減少FOREST的破壞,所以不准用TRUCK來運木材,因為用TRUCK來運會造成大的破壞。用HELICOPTER就能起到保護這些FOREST的作用。問WEAKEN.

1.用直升機運也要毀壞場地,clear an area near the tree

2.過去10年,這個城市要求修路不能毀壞場地已經取得了明顯的效果

3.最近一些年來,政府的REGULATION已經讓TRUCK對FOREST的DAMAGE限制在了WILDERNESS了。WILDERNESS暗示這些地方沒有FOREST

我把各家的JJ集中起來,目前兩人是選1,其他2和3各一人,
各位覺得那個答案比較合理,討論一下吧? 感覺1和3都很合理啊 ><

沙发
发表于 2008-4-11 18:45:00 | 只看该作者
770的大牛选的3,但是我觉得1对啊
板凳
发表于 2008-4-11 19:44:00 | 只看该作者
1反对前提吧
地板
发表于 2008-4-11 19:55:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用kennyin在2008-4-11 18:00:00的发言:

一個地方的政府為了減少FOREST的破壞,所以不准用TRUCK來運木材,因為用TRUCK來運會造成大的破壞。用HELICOPTER就能起到保護這些FOREST的作用。問WEAKEN.

1.用直升機運也要毀壞場地,clear an area near the tree

2.過去10年,這個城市要求修路不能毀壞場地已經取得了明顯的效果

3.最近一些年來,政府的REGULATION已經讓TRUCK對FOREST的DAMAGE限制在了WILDERNESS了。WILDERNESS暗示這些地方沒有FOREST

我把各家的JJ集中起來,目前兩人是選1,其他2和3各一人,
各位覺得那個答案比較合理,討論一下吧? 感覺1和3都很合理啊 ><

原題,因為卡車會破壞,所以換直升機

要反駁他往直升機反駁應該最為得當

也就是直升機也會破壞,這比較像GMAT的出題模式,答案一

第三個也有反駁,但反駁的是原本就不破壞森林了。你換直升機也沒用。還要再繞一圈來想。

小弟淺見!!!

5#
发表于 2008-4-11 21:37:00 | 只看该作者

加問!!!!!!!!!

           两组人做实验
                    
一组人给他看跟钱有关的词汇
                    
另一组人看正常的词汇
                    
结果让这两组人一起解谜(puzzle)发现头一组人比较少发问
                    
因此判断看钱有关的词汇使人比较不合作

··························································································································································

(也是JJ里有的)说给两组志愿者看不同的单词,一个是跟钱有关,另一个是中性的词,然后让他们参与活动,发现看了跟钱有关的单词的人更不爱合作,所以研究者认为是钱这些个概念在影响问assumption

选项有那些中性词不会引起*****念头,还有个在看单词之前,两组志愿者的合作意愿是一样高的,我选的是最后这个,曾经觉得第一个也挺有道理,如果中性词能引起钱的概念那实验就失效了,但看到最后那个选项又觉得这个更对,想起高中时候设计生物实验就是这样搞单一变量。也有可能是我选项理解有误,反正仅供参考

··························································································································································

有那道说钱有关的人不合作的问题
                    
问假设
正确答案应该是不说钱不能让人更合作
                    
这个比较有把握

 

我整理一下答案

1、中性词不会引起*****念头

2、还有个在看单词之前,两组志愿者的合作意愿是一样高的

3、不说钱不能让人更合作

Which one!?!?!?!?

 

6#
发表于 2008-4-11 21:47:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用GavinDing在2008-4-11 19:55:00的发言:

原題,因為卡車會破壞,所以換直升機

要反駁他往直升機反駁應該最為得當

也就是直升機也會破壞,這比較像GMAT的出題模式,答案一

第三個也有反駁,但反駁的是原本就不破壞森林了。你換直升機也沒用。還要再繞一圈來想。

小弟淺見!!!

原本就不破坏森林是典型的反对前提。

7#
发表于 2008-4-11 22:05:00 | 只看该作者

1.      OG 11 202,題目一樣,但選項變了。

Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both grain and meatHowever, as per capita income in Gortland has risen toward the world averageper capita consumption of meat has also risen toward the world averageand it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meatThereforesince per capita income continues to risewhereas domestic grain production will not increaseGortland will soon have to import either grain or meat or both

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The total acreage devoted to grain production in Gortland will not decrease substantially

(B) The population of Gortland has remained relatively constant during the country's years of growing prosperity

(C) The per capita consumption of meat in Gortland is roughly the same across all income levels

(D) In Gortlandneither meat nor grain is subject to government price controls

(E) People in Gortland who increase their consumption of meat will not radically decrease their consumption of grain

這題答案為!?

8#
发表于 2008-4-11 22:24:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用GavinDing在2008-4-11 22:05:00的发言:

1.      OG 11 202,題目一樣,但選項變了。

Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both grain and meatHowever, as per capita income in Gortland has risen toward the world averageper capita consumption of meat has also risen toward the world averageand it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meatThereforesince per capita income continues to risewhereas domestic grain production will not increaseGortland will soon have to import either grain or meat or both

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The total acreage devoted to grain production in Gortland will not decrease substantially

(B) The population of Gortland has remained relatively constant during the country's years of growing prosperity

(C) The per capita consumption of meat in Gortland is roughly the same across all income levels

(D) In Gortlandneither meat nor grain is subject to government price controls

(E) People in Gortland who increase their consumption of meat will not radically decrease their consumption of grain

這題答案為!?

E

9#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-4-11 22:35:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用GavinDing在2008-4-11 21:37:00的发言:

加問!!!!!!!!!

           两组人做实验
     
一组人给他看跟钱有关的词汇
     
另一组人看正常的词汇
     
结果让这两组人一起解谜(puzzle)发现头一组人比较少发问
     
因此判断看钱有关的词汇使人比较不合作

··························································································································································

(也是JJ里有的)说给两组志愿者看不同的单词,一个是跟钱有关,另一个是中性的词,然后让他们参与活动,发现看了跟钱有关的单词的人更不爱合作,所以研究者认为是钱这些个概念在影响问assumption

选项有那些中性词不会引起*****念头,还有个在看单词之前,两组志愿者的合作意愿是一样高的,我选的是最后这个,曾经觉得第一个也挺有道理,如果中性词能引起钱的概念那实验就失效了,但看到最后那个选项又觉得这个更对,想起高中时候设计生物实验就是这样搞单一变量。也有可能是我选项理解有误,反正仅供参考

··························································································································································

有那道说钱有关的人不合作的问题
     
问假设
正确答案应该是不说钱不能让人更合作
     
这个比较有把握

 

我整理一下答案

1、中性词不会引起*****念头

2、还有个在看单词之前,两组志愿者的合作意愿是一样高的

3、不说钱不能让人更合作

Which one!?!?!?!?

 

 

個人傾向選2,有點類似實驗組對照組的概念,實驗前兩樣本條件須都一致
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-4-11 22:38:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用aoteman在2008-4-11 21:47:00的发言:

原本就不破坏森林是典型的反对前提。

不太理解你的意思,所以你傾向的答案是?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-5 20:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部