大家來確認一下本月JJ CR直升機那道題的選項答案

woklovepp

以下是引用kennyin在2008-4-11 18:00:00的发言：

一個地方的政府為了減少FOREST的破壞，所以不准用TRUCK來運木材，因為用TRUCK來運會造成大的破壞。用HELICOPTER就能起到保護這些FOREST的作用。問WEAKEN.

1.用直升機運也要毀壞場地，clear an area near the tree

2.過去10年，這個城市要求修路不能毀壞場地已經取得了明顯的效果

3.最近一些年來，政府的REGULATION已經讓TRUCK對FOREST的DAMAGE限制在了WILDERNESS了。WILDERNESS暗示這些地方沒有FOREST

我把各家的JJ集中起來，目前兩人是選1，其他2和3各一人，
各位覺得那個答案比較合理，討論一下吧? 感覺1和3都很合理啊 ><

我觉得应该选1

woklovepp

以下是引用GavinDing在2008-4-11 22:05:00的发言：

1.      OG 11 202，題目一樣，但選項變了。

Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both grain and meat．However, as per capita income in Gortland has risen toward the world average，per capita consumption of meat has also risen toward the world average，and it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat．Therefore，since per capita income continues to rise，whereas domestic grain production will not increase，Gortland will soon have to import either grain or meat or both．

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The total acreage devoted to grain production in Gortland will not decrease substantially

(B) The population of Gortland has remained relatively constant during the country's years of growing prosperity．

(C) The per capita consumption of meat in Gortland is roughly the same across all income levels．

(D) In Gortland，neither meat nor grain is subject to government price controls．

(E) People in Gortland who increase their consumption of meat will not radically decrease their consumption of grain

這題答案為!?

E

aoteman

以下是引用kennyin在2008-4-11 22:38:00的发言：
不太理解你的意思，所以你傾向的答案是?

原文说road 破坏森林，你举个例子说不破坏，这是反对前提。是抬杠阿。我倾向选直升机也破坏森林。