GMAT逻辑大全 Test 3-15

adasuying2004 · 发表于 2010-8-21 13:29:26

Bill: Smoke-detecting fire alarms can save lives. I believe that every apartment in this city should be required by law to be equipped with a smoke detector.
Joe: I disagree with your proposal. Smoke detectors are just as important for safety in private houses as they are in apartment.
From this exchange, it can be inferred that Joe has interpreted Bill’s statement to mean that
(A) the city should be responsible for providing smoke detectors for apartments
(B) residences outside the city should not be equipped with smoke detectors
(C) only apartments should be equipped with smoke detectors
(D) the risk of fire is not as great in private houses as it is in apartments
(E) the rate of death by fire is unusually high in the city in question

答案是C。对于这种inferred的题目，我总是一头雾水。望高手赐教！

kula0215 · 发表于 2010-8-22 09:41:47

bill说的他觉得没有apartment都应该装sd
joe说他觉得不同意,觉得对于apartment和pricvate houses sd一样重要
隐含了bill不同意joe的观点的意思
既对于apartment和pricvatehouses sd不是同等重要由bill的话知他更突出对apartment的重要性

abe对比的不是aparment 和ph
d和bill的意思相反
选c

我是这样判断的~~~

GMAT逻辑大全 Test 3-15

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块