ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1825|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GMAT逻辑大全 Test 3-15

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-8-21 13:29:26 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Bill: Smoke-detecting fire alarms can save lives. I believe that every apartment in this city should be required by law to be equipped with a smoke detector.
Joe: I disagree with your proposal. Smoke detectors are just as important for safety in private houses as they are in apartment.
From this exchange, it can be inferred that Joe has interpreted Bill’s statement to mean that
(A) the city should be responsible for providing smoke detectors for apartments
(B) residences outside the city should not be equipped with smoke detectors
(C) only apartments should be equipped with smoke detectors
(D) the risk of fire is not as great in private houses as it is in apartments
(E) the rate of death by fire is unusually high in the city in question

答案是C。对于这种inferred的题目,我总是一头雾水。望高手赐教!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-8-22 09:41:47 | 只看该作者
bill说的他觉得没有apartment都应该装sd
joe说他觉得不同意,觉得对于apartment和pricvate houses sd一样重要
隐含了bill不同意joe的观点的意思
既对于apartment和pricvatehouses sd不是同等重要 由bill的话知他更突出对apartment的重要性

abe对比的不是aparment 和ph
d和bill的意思相反
选c  

我是这样判断的~~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-29 22:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部