A greater number of newspapers are sold in Town S than in Town T. Therefore, the citizens of Town S are better informed about major world events than are the citizens of Town T. Each of the following, if true, weakens the conclusion above EXCEPT: (A) Town S has a larger population than Town T. (B) Most citizens of Town T work in Town S and buy their newspapers there. (C) The average citizen of Town S spends less time reading newspapers than does the average citizen of Town T. (D) A weekly newspaper restricted to the coverage of local events is published in Town S. (E) The average newsstand price of newspapers sold in Town S is lower than the average price of newspapers sold in Town T. 这是讨论这题的老贴http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=24&replyid=1318219&id=23688&page=2&skin=0&Star=1 大家说的跟自己的总是对不上,除了那个同样犹疑于AE之间的那位。 这题BCD可以很快排除,关键是AE, 我觉得AE简直就是一样的,S报纸卖的多,是因为人口比T多(A)/价格比T便宜(E),请问这两个在推理上有区别吗?大家都说A是消弱,那为什么E不是呢?他俩都只是说销量的问题,都没有提到世界大事问题。 我爱欧洲同学总结的: 1。S人口100,T人口50,S销量50,T销量49。此时S的INFORM程度并不如T。 2。S人口100,T人口50,S销量100,T销量25。此时S的INFORM程度比T高。 既然A可以套这个,为什么E不能理解为:因为便宜,所以S比T多卖了1封,但是情况1来说,不能说better informed? |