看不懂谢谢大侠帮忙^-^

谢沁薇 · 发表于 2006-5-1 16:13:00

54. It is true that it is against international law to sell plutonium to countries that do not yet have nuclear weapons. But if United States companies do not do so, companies in other countries will.

Which of the following is most like the argument above in its logical structure?

the key is :

(D) It is true that it is against the law to burglarize people’s homes. But someone else certainly would have burglarized that house if the defendant had not done so first. D

but ...why?

谢谢劳神^-^

rosmarine · 发表于 2006-5-1 17:43:00

某件坏事我不干别人也会干。一种无理狡辩术。

谢沁薇 · 发表于 2006-5-1 20:37:00

小可爱^-^ 那你来帮我拆穿它？

gonghao · 发表于 2006-5-1 22:08:00

rosmarine说的没错啊

题目的逻辑就是，卖一种东西给没有核武器的国家是违反国际法的。但是即使美国公司不做，其他国家的公司也会做的。

要求：寻找逻辑相同的。

D：盗窃人家的房子是违法的。但是其他人也将会盗窃那房子如果那房子没做安全措施的话

谢沁薇 · 发表于 2006-5-1 23:13:00

知道了谢谢二位^-^

看不懂谢谢大侠帮忙^-^