ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7222|回复: 21
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og-5-25

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-1-17 00:27:00 | 只看该作者

og-5-25

Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they
separated an invertebrate animal embryo into two parts
at an early stage of its life, it would survive and develop
as two normal embryos. This led them to believe that the
(5) cells in the early embryo are undetermined in the sense
that each cell has the potential to develop in a variety of
different ways. Later biologists found that the situation
was not so simple. It matters in which plane the embryo
is cut. If it is cut in a plane different from the one used
(10) by the early investigators, it will not form two whole
embryos.
A debate arose over what exactly was happening.
Which embryo cells are determined, just when do they218
become irreversibly committed to their fates, and what
(15) are the “morphogenetic determinants” that tell a cell
what to become? But the debate could not be resolved
because no one was able to ask the crucial questions
in a form in which they could be pursued productively.
Recent discoveries in molecular biology, however, have
(20) opened up prospects for a resolution of the debate.
Now investigators think they know at least some of the
molecules that act as morphogenetic determinants in
early development. They have been able o show that,
in a sense, cell determination begins even before an egg
(25) is fertilized.
Studying sea urchins, biologist Paul Gross found
that an unfertilized egg contains substances that function
as morphogenetic determinants. They are located
in the cytoplasm of the egg cell; i.e., in that part of the
(30) cell’s protoplasm that lies outside of the nucleus. In the
unfertilized egg, the substances are inactive and are not
distributed homogeneously. When the egg is fertilized,
the substances become active and, presumably, govern
the behavior of the genes they interact with. Since the
(35) substances are unevenly distributed in the egg, when the
fertilized egg divides, the resulting cells are different
from the start and so can be qualitatively different in
their own gene activity.
The substances that Gross studied are maternal
(40) messenger RNA’s --products of certain of the maternal
genes. He and other biologists studying a wide variety
of organisms have found that these particular RNA’s
direct, in large part, the synthesis of histones, a class
of proteins that bind to DNA. Once synthesized, the
(45) histones move into the cell nucleus, where section of
DNA wrap around them to form a structure that resembles
beads, or knots, on a string. The beads are DNA
segments wrapped around the histones; the string is the
intervening DNA. And it is the structure of these beaded
(50) DNA strings that guides the fate of the cells in which
they are located.



25. It can be inferred from the passage that the morphogenetic determinants present in the early embryo are
(A) located in the nucleus of the embryo cells
(B) evenly distributed unless the embryo is not developing normally
219
(C) inactive until the embryo cells become irreversibly committed to their final function
(D) identical to those that were already present in the unfertilized egg
(E) present in larger quantities than is necessary for the development of a single individual


25.
E is the best answer.
The second and third paragraphs of the passage indicate that morphogenetic determinants are substances in the embryo that are activated after the egg has been fertilized and that “tell a cell
what to become” (lines 21-23). If, as the author asserts in the first paragraph, biologists have
succeeded in dividing an embryo into two parts, each of which survives and develops into a
normal embryo, it can be concluded that the quantity of morphogenetic determinants in the early
embryo is greater than that required for the development of a single individual.


这题版面上所有的讨论都看了,可是我怎么觉得大家都没讲清楚啊?


红线部分


生物学家成功的把一个胚胎分成了两部分,且这两部分都发展成了一个独立的胚胎,这就能得出结论:morphogenetic determinants在早期胚胎中得数量远远多于发展一个独立胚胎所需数量?


这哪跟哪啊?


怎么推导得啊?是否中间省略了什么步骤?

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-17 00:32:00 | 只看该作者

看了flora_wang 对此题得解释越发不明白了,copy一下给大家看看


http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=25&ID=36768


这个是很难很难的.
25. It can be inferred from the passage that the morphogent'tic determinants present in the early embryo are
(A) located in the nucleus of the embryo cells 这个不对,不在细胞核里头
(B) evenly distributed unless the embryo is not developing normally I 不对,明确说是not evenly
(C) inactive until the embryo cells become irreversibly committed to their final <I>function</I> 时间上的分水岭是fertilized or not,这个也不对
(0) identical to those that were already present in the unfertilized egg 这个不对,that the morphogent'tic determinants present in the early embryo 应该是不同的.至少可以找到有发展
(E) present in larger quantities than is necessary for , the development of a single individual :
只有e有味道.就是第一段.科学家分开受精卵而能够发育为两个独立的胚胎,吧e取非,就和文章矛盾了.所以e对.


划黄线部分:咋就取非对了呢?



板凳
发表于 2005-1-17 01:42:00 | 只看该作者

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=25&ID=77989&page=1


我认为,这是说,我们可以从生物学家分embryo的试验得知,morphogenetic determinants可用于多于一个的个体成长。这是一个简单的递进推理


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-17 1:44:07编辑过]
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-17 09:06:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用wangyu73cn在2005-1-17 1:42:00的发言:

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=25&ID=77989&page=1


我认为,这是说,我们可以从生物学家分embryo的试验得知,morphogenetic determinants可用于多于一个的个体成长。这是一个简单的递进推理



If, as the author asserts in the first paragraph, biologists have succeeded in dividing an embryo into two parts, each of which survives and develops into a normal embryo, it can be concluded that the quantity of morphogenetic determinants in the early embryo is greater than that required for the development of a single individual.


是不是这个意思:生物学家成功的把一个胚胎分成两个部分,每个都成活并发展成一个独立的个体(就是变成了两个胚胎)。既然受精后可以分裂出成千上万的细胞,所以,morphogenetic determinants 的数量一定多于发展成一个独立细胞所用的数量。


这里隐去了一个常识:一个细胞可以分裂成无数个细胞。


我这么分析对吗?一点生物学常识没有的说,不知这样推对否?


正确的应该怎么推呢?怎么就简单的递进推理了呢?

5#
发表于 2005-1-17 12:28:00 | 只看该作者
present in larger quantities than is necessary for the development of a single individual。这里的个体,不是指可不断分裂的无数细胞,而是指可独立存活的少数胚胎。
6#
发表于 2005-5-22 19:04:00 | 只看该作者

呵呵,这道题目本来是逐渐的明白了,怎么又感到疑惑了,谢谢楼上各位。

7#
发表于 2005-7-28 18:35:00 | 只看该作者

F。。。这道题

8#
发表于 2005-8-3 13:08:00 | 只看该作者

morphogenetic determinants 的数量一定多于发展成一个独立胚胎所用的数量。取非,不多于的话,那分离出来的胚胎就不能存活!


不知道是不是这么理解?

9#
发表于 2005-8-5 10:55:00 | 只看该作者

25.
E is the best answer.
The second and third paragraphs of the passage indicate that morphogenetic determinants are substances in the embryo that are activated after the egg has been fertilized and that “tell a cell
what to become” (lines 21-23). If, as the author asserts in the first paragraph, biologists have
succeeded in dividing an embryo into two parts, each of which survives and develops into a
normal embryo, it can be concluded that the quantity of morphogenetic determinants in the early
embryo is greater than that required for the development of a single individual.


这题版面上所有的讨论都看了,可是我怎么觉得大家都没讲清楚啊?
红线部分
生物学家成功的把一个胚胎分成了两部分,且这两部分都发展成了一个独立的胚胎,这就能得出结论:morphogenetic determinants在早期胚胎中得数量远远多于发展一个独立胚胎所需数量?
这哪跟哪啊?



偶觉得,这里的quantity理解为量可能更好,


偶对这题的理解是:由第一段切开仍能发育成完整的,说明一个分成2个也够,即说明1个中的morphogenetic太多了。


不知道对不对,请nn们指点。


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-8-5 10:56:39编辑过]
10#
发表于 2005-8-6 00:01:00 | 只看该作者
个人也觉得这题实在太难了,只能用排除法作了。A,B,D很明显是错的,与文章讲的主题不一致,但是c有一点迷惑。可是仔细一看,也是不对的,文章也没有提到final function。所以只有选e了。一个细胞的morphogenetic可以变成2个个体,说明其中一部分就够一个细胞自己用的了。哎~,题目太难,继续看解释。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-9 16:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部