ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Magazine Publisher: Our magazine does not have a liberal bias. It is true that when a book review we had commissioned last year turned out to express distinctly conservative views, we did not publish it until we had also obtained a second review that took a strongly liberal position. Clearly, however, our actions demonstrate not a bias in favor of liberal views but rather a commitment to a balanced presentation of diverse opinions.

Determining which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the cogency of the magazine publisher's response?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 11077|回复: 24
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD7-41怎么看也不会做

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-8-15 11:42:00 | 只看该作者

GWD7-41怎么看也不会做

Magazine Publisher:  Our magazine does not have a liberal bias.  It is true that when a book review we had commissioned last year turned out to express distinctly conservative views, we did not publish it until we had also obtained a second review that took a strongly liberal position.  Clearly, however, our actions demonstrate not a bias in favor of liberal views but rather a commitment to a balanced presentation of diverse opinions.



Determining which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the cogency of the magazine publisher’s response?




  • Whether any other magazines in which the book was reviewed carried more than one review of the book

  • Whether the magazine publishes unsolicited book reviews as well as those that it has commissioned

  • Whether in the event that a first review commissioned by the magazine takes a clearly liberal position the magazine would make any efforts to obtain further reviews

  • Whether the book that was the subject of the two reviews was itself written from a clearly conservative or a clearly liberal point of view

  •    E.Whether most of the readers of the magazine regularly read the book reviews that the  magazine publishes


    这道题我怎么想不明白呀,还请大牛指点迷津!!!

    沙发
    发表于 2005-8-16 10:13:00 | 只看该作者
    我觉得这道题是说一个杂志社说他们没有liberal bias。去年,他们在第一遍book
    view时有conservative的趋向,但他们没有publish,直到第二遍review时产生了liberal
    position。所以这说明杂志社不是主观上有liberal bias,之所以让人觉得他们liberal,是在平衡各方面的意见的过程中产生的。



    打个简单的比喻:别人说你喜欢A女生,因为你送花给她了,你辩解说不是,因为你先给了B女生花,为了照顾A的情绪才又送花给A的。 那么怎样才能evaluate你说的是不是呢?那就看如果让你先送给A女生花,然后看你会不会也送给B女生花。这就是答案C的意思。



    不知道讲清楚了没有,共勉!!!

    板凳
    发表于 2005-8-16 14:09:00 | 只看该作者
    反正就是这种题目当作加强来做就好了,楼上的讲的很好,比较直白
    地板
    发表于 2005-8-17 16:53:00 | 只看该作者
    二楼的讲得有道理!
    5#
    发表于 2007-5-29 17:01:00 | 只看该作者

    说的真好

    6#
    发表于 2007-5-29 23:11:00 | 只看该作者
    二楼解释地生动形象啊,佩服佩服!
    7#
    发表于 2007-5-30 03:04:00 | 只看该作者

    楼上的比喻太妙了!再来个通俗的:

    原告(杂志社)陈述:有人质疑我们杂志社:先得到了保守观点的书评不发,非要等到有个自由观点的来了一起发,你们是不是有自由观点倾向,(是不是歧视保守观点啊)?大人,冤枉啊!!!我们对两者一视同人啊!!!不是两个都发了嘛?!

    判官评估:如果你们杂志社一开始就得到了自由的观点,是不是立马就发表了?还会等到保守观点的来了再一起发表吗?(是不是保守观点如果后来了你们也不准备发了?你们以前会等,是因为你们偏向的自由观点文章没出现吧?Sigh!)

    8#
    发表于 2007-5-30 19:51:00 | 只看该作者

    呵呵,很恰当的比喻

    9#
    发表于 2007-7-5 13:51:00 | 只看该作者
    我怎麼覺得(D)很好耶
    如果是那本書是自由觀點 當在第一次書評是保守觀點時 出版者等待直到第二次自由觀點的書評 剛好證明該雜誌是平衡報導取向
    如果是那本書是保守觀點 當在第一次書評是保守觀點時 出版者卻刻意等待直到第二次自由觀點的書評 剛好證明該雜誌是偏頗報導取向
    因此(D)可以evaluate出版者的回應
    10#
    发表于 2007-7-7 15:05:00 | 只看该作者
    我选D
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-4 19:21
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部