[讨论]GWD 8 25-28

Q25 to Q28:
Jon Clark’s study of the effect of
the modernization of a telephone
exchange on exchange maintenance
Line work and workers is a solid contribution
(5) to a debate that encompasses two
lively issues in the history and sociol16
ogy of technology: technological
determinism and social constructivism.
Clark makes the point that the char-
(10) acteristics of a technology have a
decisive influence on job skills and
work organization. Put more strongly,
technology can be a primary determinant
of social and managerial organ-
(15) ization. Clark believes this possibility
has been obscured by the recent sociological
fashion, exemplified by
Braverman’s analysis, that emphasizes
the way machinery reflects social
(20) choices. For Braverman, the shape of
a technological system is subordinate
to the manager’s desire to wrest control
of the labor process from the
workers. Technological change is
(25) construed as the outcome of negotiations
among interested parties who
seek to incorporate their own interests
into the design and configuration of the
machinery. This position represents
(30) the new mainstream called social constructivism.
The constructivists gain acceptance
by misrepresenting technological determinism:
technological determinists are
(35) supposed to believe, for example, that
machinery imposes appropriate forms
of order on society. The alternative to
constructivism, in other words, is to
view technology as existing outside
(40) society, capable of directly influencing
skills and work organization.
Clark refutes the extremes of the
constructivists by both theoretical and
empirical arguments. Theoretically he
(45) defines “technology” in terms of relationships
between social and technical
variables. Attempts to reduce the
meaning of technology to cold, hard
metal are bound to fail, for machinery
(50) is just scrap unless it is organized
functionally and supported by appropriate
systems of operation and main17
tenance. At the empirical level Clark
shows how a change at the telephone
(55) exchange from maintenance-intensive
electromechanical switches to semielectronic
switching systems altered
work tasks, skills, training opportunities,
administration, and organization of
(60) workers. Some changes Clark attributes
to the particular way management
and labor unions negotiated the introduction
of the technology, whereas
others are seen as arising from the
(65) capabilities and nature of the technology
itself. Thus Clark helps answer
the question: “When is social choice
decisive and when are the concrete
characteristics of technology more
important?”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q25:
The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. advocate a more positive attitude toward technological change
B. discuss the implications for employees of the modernization of a telephone
exchange
C. consider a successful challenge to the constructivist view of technological change
D. challenge the position of advocates of technological determinism
E. suggest that the social causes of technological change should be studied in real
situations

看也一圈关于这篇文章的讨论，没有发现一个挑战这道题答案的，难道是我错了？

这题给的答案是C，我选A，理由如下

文章主要讨论了Clark的理论，Clark对技术变革持积极的态度，另外很文章的作者的口气上很明白，作者是支持这一理论的，因此A总体上没有问题

C用的动词Consider，理解不上来文章是如何Consider的，另外Clark的理论是自成体系的，并不是全部是用来Challenge Social Constructivism，他的理论只是在客观上Challenge了Social Constructivism，因此说整篇文章都在consider对social constructivism的challenge并不准确。另外选项用了sucsessful，表明Clark的理论已经被大众所接受，在文章中作者是明显的支持Clark，但我没有读到什么地方表明Clark的理论已经被广泛接受，因此successul用的也不准确

请大家指教

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=25&ID=96713

供参考。

我选C。A中advocate a more positive attitude toward technological change的更加积极正面的态度，我认为，是不能反映文章中侧重对不同观点冲突的论述的。感觉文章内容不能以“态度”这个层次来进行概括。

版主给的连接中最后的一个帖子给的答案与我选的答案是一样的。

大家还有没有持同样观点的？