ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1292|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]2772#44/63 作者态度问题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-4-10 18:10:00 | 只看该作者

[讨论]2772#44/63 作者态度问题

一篇关于生物两种分类变三种分类的问题。

 最后一题关于作者态度有点疑问,从哪里可以看出是tentative acceptance呢?看作者第一句once, 和后来These techniques have strongly suggested 我的感觉作者应该是很支持whole hearted endorsement啊。

请熟悉的和理解的透彻的朋友指教一下,谢谢您了.


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-4-10 18:13:00编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2015-3-16 23:18:05 | 只看该作者
Although much of this picture has been sustained by more recent research, it seems fundamentally wrong in one respect. Among the bacteria, there are organisms that are significantly different both from the cells of eukaryotes and from the true bacteria, and it now appears that there are three stems in the tree of life. New techniques for determining the molecular sequence of the RNA of organisms have produced evolutionary information about the degree to which organisms are related, the time since they diverged from a common ancestor, and the reconstruction of ancestral versions of genes. These techniques have strongly suggested that although the true bacteria indeed form a large coherent group, certain other bacteria, the archaebacteria, which are also prokaryotes and which resemble true bacteria, represent a distinct evolutionary branch that far antedates the common ancestor of all true bacteria.

请看蓝色字部分,it seems:看起来原来的分类有点错误。
it now appears that: 看起来会有三种可能
strongly suggested that: 强烈建议出....
这三个语气都没有强烈到完全相信。这样的语气是具有保留意见的。

以上为个人的一点浅见,还请牛牛多多指教。
板凳
发表于 2015-3-22 10:12:30 | 只看该作者
DeliciaAn 发表于 2015-3-16 23:18
Although much of this picture has been sustained by more recent research, it seems fundamentally wro ...

你太厉害了 跪拜
地板
发表于 2015-3-22 18:11:20 | 只看该作者
2643301345 发表于 2015-3-22 10:12
你太厉害了 跪拜

哈哈......

没有没有啦。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-27 22:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部