- UID
- 1239
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2003-3-24
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
LSAT-Set12-SecII-Q22
22. Oil company representative: We spent more money on cleaning the otters affected by our recent oil spill than has been spent on any previous marine mammal rescue project. This shows our concern for the environment.
Environmentalist: You have no such concern. Your real concern is evident in your admission to the press that news photographs of oil-covered otters would be particularly damaging to your public image, which plays an important role in your level of sales.
The environmentalist's conclusion would be properly drawn if it were true that the
(A) oil company cannot have more than one motive for cleaning the otters affected by the oil spill
(B) otter population in the area of the oil spill could not have survived without the cleaning project
(C) oil company has always shown a high regard for its profits in choosing its courses of action
(D) government would have spent the money to clean the otters if the oil company had not agreed to do it
(E) oil company's efforts toward cleaning the affected otters have been more successful than have such efforts in previous projects to clean up oil spills
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
答案A, 为何C不对?A也未必能使环境学家结论成立?请大家指教.
|
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2003-4-15 23:08:00
楼主