ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 13198|回复: 20
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]GWD-6-36

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-1-9 11:48:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]GWD-6-36

GWD-6-Q35 to GWD-6-Q37:


(The following is excerpted from material written in 1992.)



Many researchers regard Thailand’s


        recent economic growth, as reflected by its


        gross domestic product (GDP) growth rates,


Line  as an example of the success of a modern


  (5)        technological development strategy based


on the market economics of industrialized


countries.  Yet by focusing solely on aggre-


gate economic growth data as the measure


of Thailand’s development, these research-


(10)        ers have overlooked the economic impact of


rural development projects that improve


people’s daily lives at the village level—


such as the cooperative raising of water


buffalo, improved sanitation, and the devel-


(15)        opment of food crops both for consumption


and for sale at local markets; such projects


are not adequately reflected in the country’s


GDP.  These researchers, influenced by


Robert Heilbroner’s now outdated develop-


(20)        ment theory, tend to view nontechnological


        development as an obstacle to progress.


        Heilbroner’s theory has become doctrine in


some economics textbooks:  for example,


Monte Palmer disparages nontechnological


rural development projects as inhibiting


constructive change.  Yet as Ann Kelleher’s


two recent case studies of the Thai villages


Non Muang and Dong Keng illustrate, the


nontechnological-versus-technological


(30)        dichotomy can lead researchers not only to


overlook real advances achieved by rural


development projects but also mistakenly to


        conclude that because such advances are


initiated by rural leaders and are based on


(35)        traditional values and practices, they retard


“real” economic development.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


GWD-6-Q36:


It can be inferred from the passage that the term “real” in line 36 most likely refers to economic development that is


               



  • based on a technological development strategy

  • not necessarily favored by most researchers

  • initiated by rural leader

  • a reflection of traditional values and practices

  • difficult to measure statistically

  • ===========================


    請問答案為什麼是A


    為什麼不是D呢~


    謝謝指教  感激不盡~!!



    沙发
    发表于 2005-1-17 13:30:00 | 只看该作者
    我一时也分辨不清,请别人看看吧。帮着顶一下。
    [此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-17 14:52:30编辑过]
    板凳
    发表于 2005-1-18 12:57:00 | 只看该作者

    a reflection of traditional values and practices:

    Please check out the last couple of lines of the article. The advancement achieved by the rural leaders and based on TRADITIONAL VALUES AND PRACTICES actually RETART the so-called REAL development. The option D is in effect against that...

    地板
    发表于 2005-8-5 14:28:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用xealot在2005-1-18 12:57:00的发言:

    a reflection of traditional values and practices:


    Please check out the last couple of lines of the article. The advancement achieved by the rural leaders and based on TRADITIONAL VALUES AND PRACTICES actually RETART the so-called REAL development. The option D is in effect against that...



    同意


    我的理解是這樣


    the


    nontechnological-versus-technological


    (30)        dichotomy can lead researchers not only to


    overlook real advances achieved by rural


    development projects but also mistakenly to


            conclude that because such advances (主語)are


    initiated by rural leaders and (such advances)are based on


    (35)        traditional values and practices, they(such advances) retard


    “real” economic development.


    所以A對


    "real"指的是高科技發展.....




    我一開始也選了D

    5#
    发表于 2005-9-17 14:52:00 | 只看该作者

    我选的也是D,因为文中说的全都是关于忽视nontechnological development的影响,并没有说technologcal development怎么样呀,doctrine不就是traditional 的同义变换吗?哪位来解释一下我的思路对不对啊~~~~


    These researchers, influenced by



    Robert Heilbroner’s now outdated develop-



    (20)      ment theory, tend to view nontechnological



           development as an obstacle to progress.


           Heilbroner’s theory has become doctrine in


    some economics textbooks:  for example,


    Monte Palmer disparages nontechnological



    (25)      rural development projects as inhibiting


    constructive change.  Yet as Ann Kelleher’s


    two recent case studies of the Thai villages


    Non Muang and Dong Keng illustrate, the


    nontechnological-versus-technological


    (30)      dichotomy can lead researchers not only to


    overlook real advances achieved by rural


    development projects but also mistakenly to



           conclude that because such advances are



    initiated by rural leaders and are based on



    (35)      traditional values and practices, they retard



    “real” economic development.




    [此贴子已经被作者于2005-9-17 14:57:19编辑过]
    6#
    发表于 2005-9-17 15:05:00 | 只看该作者

    刚刚又看了一遍,发现A也有道理了


    Many researchers regard Thailand’s


           recent economic growth, as reflected by its


           gross domestic product (GDP) growth rates,


    Line       as an example of the success of a modern


      (5)      technological development strategy based


    on the market economics of industrialized


    countries.  Yet by focusing solely on aggre-


    gate economic growth data as the measure


    of Thailand’s development, these research-


    (10)      ers have overlooked the economic impact of


                  rural development projects that。。



    文章的意思是不是说没有考虑rural development的就是technological development strategy呢?如果这样的话,A,D就是一个意思啦,有两个正确选项吗?

    7#
    发表于 2005-9-17 15:12:00 | 只看该作者

    就我一个人在这里罗嗦哈


    UPUP!!

    8#
    发表于 2005-9-18 02:48:00 | 只看该作者

    关键在于前面的动词retard, 意思是“延迟,使减速”,所以because such advances areinitiated by rural leaders and are based on  traditional values and practices, they retard


    “real” economic development.  是文章所批判的RESEARCHERS的意见,这个意见的基础就是A项,所以“real”指的就是A项。



    9#
    发表于 2005-10-9 01:40:00 | 只看该作者

    楼上说的很好,可是我考试时不认识这词咋办?


    从对全文主题的理解中也是可以体会出作作者反对这些经济学家的看法,认为他们忽略了rural development,他们只看到technology是不对的。用“real”是一种反对、讽刺。


    10#
    发表于 2005-10-9 14:54:00 | 只看该作者

    用“real”是一种反对、讽刺。



    这不就够了吗

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-8 23:01
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部