文章主旨:讲述Efficient wage hypothesis,以及有什么好处
文章结构:
1. 引出EW假说,大致说明假说之间的变量(?)
EW假说会让人觉得高生产力会带来高薪或者短工作时间。然而,EW假说反转了这两个要素之间的因果关系。这篇文章的前提是生产力的进步与工作时长(work duration)也有关系。因此,就像效率高薪可以降低用工成本,workweeks也可以。
2. 开始解释EW假说,以及它的好处
EW假说可以稳定就业率,但是它有更大的作用——提高人们的生产力以及未来一代人的生产力。
3. ford是EW假说的先驱
ford提出八小时工作制,并且提出了当时的最低工资($5)。但是,经济学家们把目光放在最低工资上,从而忽略了另外一个virtue——工作时间的减少。
4. 工作时间减少的好处
工作时间的减少会使得人们休闲时间的增多,从而她们有更多的时间精力去购买、享受goods。就像ford预测的那样——工作时间会减少,因为如果不减少的话,一个国家生产段东西不会被国民消耗,那么这个国家也不会这么繁荣了。EW假说不只是一个短期提高国民需求的方法。社会生产力的提高以及工作时间的减少会使得人们生活水平的提高。总的来说,短期内,人们会变得更有生产力;长期中,子孙后代也会受益于这种人力资本的投资。
background knowledge: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efficiency_wage
The term efficiency wages (or rather "efficiency earnings") was introduced by Alfred Marshall to denote the wage per efficiency unit of labor.[1] Marshallian efficiency wages would make employers pay different wages to workers who are of different efficiencies such that the employer would be indifferent between more-efficient workers and less-efficient workers. The modern use of the term is quite different and refers to the idea that higher wages may increase the efficiency of the workers by various channels, making it worthwhile for the employers to offer wages that exceed a market-clearing level. Optimal efficiency wage is achieved when the marginal cost of an increase in wages is equal to the marginal benefit of improved productivity to an employer.[2] In labor economics, the "efficiency wage" hypothesis argues that wages, at least in some labour markets, form in a way that is not market-clearing. Specifically, it points to the incentive for managers to pay their employees more than the market-clearing wage to increase their productivity or efficiency, or to reduce costs associated with employee turnover in industries in which the costs of replacing labor are high. The increased labor productivity and/or decreased costs may pay for the higher wages. Companies tend to hire workers at lower costs, but workers expect to be paid more when they work. The labor market balances the needs of employees and companies, so wages can fluctuate and fluctuate up or down.[3] Because workers are paid more than the equilibrium wage, there may be unemployment, as the above market wage rates attract more workers. Efficiency wages offer, therefore, a market failure explanation of unemployment in contrast to theories that emphasize government intervention such as minimum wages.[2] However, efficiency wages do not necessarily imply unemployment but only uncleared markets and job rationing in those markets. There may be full employment in the economy or yet efficiency wages may prevail in some occupations. In this case there will be excess supply for those occupations and some applicants whom are not hired may have to work at a lower wage elsewhere. Conversely, if supply is less than demand, some employers will need to hire employees at higher wages, and applicants can get jobs with wages higher than the considered wages.
|