大全-5-20 请斑竹解惑！

lylove47 · 发表于 2012-8-11 16:37:46

20. For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists.

The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?

(A) Where public-service workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.
(B) Where strikes by all categories of pubic-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available.
(C) Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers where it is the only available means of settling labor disputes with such workers.
(D) Most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector.
(E) A strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without help from an arbitrator.
答案是C

对于C我已经看了以前的讨论帖，已经明白，但是请问B呢？
根据原文最后一句话：只有在公务员的工作不能被替代的情况下，政府才要禁止罢工，使仲裁成为唯一的解决方法。

B选项就是倒过来讲的啊：在罢工被禁止的部门，就是（因为）这些部门的工作不能够被替代。

B为什么不对呢？我貌似经常在这种把原文话反过来说的地方错，这种是什么错误呢？

lylove47 · 发表于 2012-8-11 16:38:13

请各位版主解答一下，感激！

lylove47 · 发表于 2012-8-11 16:51:34

anybody here？ thks

大全-5-20 请斑竹解惑！

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()