逻辑求解。。。谢谢

unimelb86 · 发表于 2011-3-11 22:52:17

Raymond Burr played the role of lawyer Perry Mason on television. Burr’s death in 1993 prompted a prominent lawyer to say “Although not a lawyer, Mr. Burr strove for such authenticity that we feel as if we lost one of our own.” This comment from a prestigious attorney provides appalling evidence that, in the face of television, even some legal professionals are losing their ability to distinguish fiction from reality.
The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument

(A) takes the views of one lawyer to represent the views of all lawyers
(B) criticizes the lawyer rather than the lawyer’s statement
(C) presumes that the lawyer is qualified to evaluate the performance of an actor
(D) focuses on a famous actor’s portrayal of a lawyer rather than on the usual way in which lawyers are portrayed on television
(E) ignores the part of the lawyer’s remark that indicates an awareness of the difference between reality and fiction

Answer E.. WHY WHY WHY????

ossan · 发表于 2011-3-13 18:06:56

这是狒狒逻辑上的题 abcd说的错误argument都没有犯啊

cycyang · 发表于 2011-3-13 21:11:05

From the comments of the prominent lawyer, we can draw a conclusion that at least this lawyer himself is aware of the difference between the reality and fiction. It is a way to complement Burr's acting skills. If so, it will contradict the statement "...losing their ability to distinguish..."

sdcar2010 · 发表于 2011-3-13 21:28:01

The key is to note "Although not a lawyer . . ."

ruirui_hsu · 发表于 2011-7-13 21:50:22

sd2010...这个题还是没懂...

nemiah · 发表于 2011-7-13 22:29:33

其实comments已经提到although not a lawyer, 表示已经知道这个difference了。

逻辑求解。。。谢谢

sdcar2010快来解答....呵呵

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()