逻辑求解。。。谢谢

unimelb86

Raymond Burr played the role of lawyer Perry Mason on television. Burr’s death in 1993 prompted a prominent lawyer to say “Although not a lawyer, Mr. Burr strove for such authenticity that we feel as if we lost one of our own.” This comment from a prestigious attorney provides appalling evidence that, in the face of television, even some legal professionals are losing their ability to distinguish fiction from reality.
The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument

(A) takes the views of one lawyer to represent the views of all lawyers
(B) criticizes the lawyer rather than the lawyer’s statement
(C) presumes that the lawyer is qualified to evaluate the performance of an actor
(D) focuses on a famous actor’s portrayal of a lawyer rather than on the usual way in which lawyers are portrayed on television
(E) ignores the part of the lawyer’s remark that indicates an awareness of the difference between reality and fiction






Answer E.. WHY WHY WHY????

ossan

这是狒狒逻辑上的题 abcd说的错误argument都没有犯啊

cycyang

From the comments of the prominent lawyer, we can draw a conclusion that at least this lawyer himself is aware of the difference between the reality and fiction. It is a way to complement Burr's acting skills. If so, it will contradict the statement "...losing their ability to distinguish..."

sdcar2010

The key is to note "Although not a lawyer . . ."

ruirui_hsu

sd2010...这个题还是没懂...

nemiah

其实comments已经提到although not a lawyer, 表示 已经知道这个difference了。