ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop animal-induced allergies, some of them quite serious. In a survey of current employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal-induced allergies. Based on this sample, experts conclude that among members of the general population who have spent a similarly large amount of time in close contact with animals, the percentage with animal-induced allergies is not 30 percent but substantially more.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest grounds for the experts' conclusion?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1185|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求解一道GWD逻辑,拜谢!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-9-20 21:45:25 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop animal-induced allergies, some of them quite serious. In a survey of current employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal-induced allergies. Based on this sample, experts conclude that among members of the general population who have spent a similarly large amount of time in close contact with animals, the percentage with animal-induced allergies is not 30 percent but substantially more.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest grounds for the experts’ conclusion?



A.A zoo employee who develops a serious animal-induced allergy is very likely to switch to some other occupation.

B.A zoo employee is more likely than a person in the general population to keep one or more animal pets at home

C.The percentage of the general population whose level of exposure to animals matches that of a zoo employee is quite small.

D.Exposure to domestic pets is, on the whole, less likely to cause animal-induced allergy than exposure to many of the animals kept in zoos.

E.Zoo employees seldom wear protective gear when they handle animals in their care.
答案A。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-9-20 21:52:49 | 只看该作者
意思就是说,zoo里面的工作人员有一些患上过敏之后就转职业了,这样zoo的工作人员的患过敏的比例就减少了,所以比那些常年跟动物接触的普通人中患过敏的比例小阿。。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-20 22:00:41 | 只看该作者
确定是这么解释的吗?这样的话那动物园里的工作人员一旦过敏了就转行,岂不是动物园里过敏的工作人员比例会越来越小吗?。。。
地板
发表于 2010-9-20 22:37:10 | 只看该作者
是说很有可能转行。。有一部分可能转行。。当然不是全部都转行。。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-20 22:50:53 | 只看该作者
好吧,谢谢!~
6#
发表于 2010-9-21 10:46:26 | 只看该作者
结论是among members of the general population who have spent a similarly large amount of time in close contact with animals, the percentage with animal-induced allergies is not 30 percent but substantially more.

我是这样想的,专家以现任动物园工作人员为样本,是30%过敏,而结论是更广泛的人群中,过敏的百分比是要大大超过30%的.那什么情况会导致这个呢.如果现任转行,这个portion就去了general population里面,然后动物园再招新人,再过敏,再转行出去,这样循环下去,那大范围的这个population过敏的比例就越来越高.

楼主你看下能理解么
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-21 12:17:55 | 只看该作者
基本上能理解了,可能当时我把general population里长时间与动物接触的人理解成所有人口了,所以觉得怎么可能超过30%。。。多谢楼上!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 17:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部