ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4229|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 12 -20

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-6-30 19:30:39 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
in recent years, many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim as artists. but since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product. for this reason, cabinetmaking is no art.
A. some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone.
B. some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce.
C. cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products they produce.
D. an object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object's practical utility.
E.artists are not concerned with the minetary value of their products.

which of the following , if true, would most strengthen the conclusion drawn by the researchers?

C 的OG解释是:
the argument primarily concerns truly successful cabinetmaking, whether it is art or not, and the role utility plays in (successful) cabinetmaking. it does not address the issue of whether or not current cabinetmakers give adquate condiration to utility or whether or not today's cabinetmakers produce truly successful and useful furniture.
我不明白C及C的解释。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-6-30 21:54:43 | 只看该作者
conclusion为cabinetmaking is no art。
求strengthen。
C. cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products they produce.
看到should,更像是suggest,recommend而非support evidence。
OG的解释为argument讨论的是cabinetmaking是否为艺术,已经实用性在其中所起的作用。而非去issue whether or not。。。即C是个issue而非support evidence。

个人浅见,参与讨论。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-11 01:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部